By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Detention Order Doesn’t Prevent Bail Consideration: Madras HC
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Madras High Court > Detention Order Doesn’t Prevent Bail Consideration: Madras HC
CriminalHigh CourtMadras High CourtNews

Detention Order Doesn’t Prevent Bail Consideration: Madras HC

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: January 27, 2025 11:48 pm
Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Share
Bail Conditions Cannot Mandate Maintenance Payment In Marital Disputes: Supreme Court
Bail Conditions Cannot Mandate Maintenance Payment In Marital Disputes: Supreme Court
SHARE

Detention Order Doesn’t Prevent Bail Consideration

The Madras High Court ruled that a detention order doesn’t prevent the court from deciding a bail application. Justice Anand Venkatesh granted bail to Mohammed Tharik Anvar @ Thar, even though a detention order under the Tamil Nadu Goondas Act was issued while his bail plea was pending.

Contents
Detention Order Doesn’t Prevent Bail ConsiderationCase OverviewCourt’s ObservationsBail ConditionsConclusion


Case Overview


Tharik was accused of extorting ₹1,000 at knifepoint. The State opposed bail, claiming he was a habitual offender with prior cases, including a murder charge and two NDPS cases. The defense argued that the FIR was fabricated to justify detention. The court noted that Tharik had secured acquittal in the NDPS cases and obtained bail earlier in the murder case.


Tharik had been in custody since December 28, 2024. The court noted that authorities did not conduct a test identification parade and did not take him into police custody.


Court’s Observations


A detention order cannot restrict the court from independently deciding a bail plea.
Bail courts cannot examine the validity of a detention order.
The petitioner can challenge the detention order in the appropriate court.


Bail Conditions


The court granted bail with conditions:
Tharik must stay in Trichy.
He must report to the Fort Police Station daily at 10:30 AM and 5:30 PM.

Conclusion

The Madras High Court emphasized that a detention order cannot bar the consideration of bail. It reiterated that individual liberty and judicial fairness must prevail. Courts have the authority to evaluate bail requests independently, even when a detention order exists. This ruling ensures the upholding of constitutional rights and guarantees the following of due process in every case.

You Might Also Like

IPC Section 121: Waging War Against the Government of India

Lack of Birth Certificate No Bar for Sports Participation: Delhi High Court

Discovery of Cash At Justice Yashwant Varma’s Official Residence: Supreme Court Has Publicised Videos and Photos

Section 307 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Language Of Courts.

Wife Can Join Husband’s Defamation Suit to Protect Family Reputation: SC

TAGGED:bailCrimeDetentionHigh CourtMadras high courtMoneyNDPS ActUnlawful Detention
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Supreme Court: NDMC Not Responsible For Staff Absorption After DSGMC School Closure Without Approval Past Irregular Promotions Cannot Justify Future Violations: Supreme Court
Next Article High Court of Kerala Cash In Bank Account Is ‘Property’ Liable For Attachment: Kerala High Court
1 Comment
  • Pingback: Non-Bailable Warrants Barred In Maintenance Cases: 125 CrPC

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Punjab and Haryana High Court
CriminalNewsPunjab & Haryana High Court

Long Custody Alone Does Not Justify Bail When Recovery Of Drugs Massive: Punjab and Haryana HC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
1 month ago
CIC Criticizes Election Commission’s Delayed Response to RTI Query on EVMs
Section 52A Of NDPS, Non-Compliance Not Always Fatal: Supreme Court Ruling
Dowry Demand Not Necessary To Prove Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC: Supreme Court
Gujarat High Court Rebukes Railways Over Lion Deaths from Train Hits
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Time Limits to Get a Response to Your RTI Application (Section 7)

How To File A Case Under The Right To Information Act?

Understanding the Right to Information: Scope and Applicability (Sections 3, 4)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?