By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Supreme Court Expresses Concern Over ‘Inhuman Working Hours’ Of Resident Doctors During RG Kar Hospital Case Hearing
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Supreme Court Expresses Concern Over ‘Inhuman Working Hours’ Of Resident Doctors During RG Kar Hospital Case Hearing
News

Supreme Court Expresses Concern Over ‘Inhuman Working Hours’ Of Resident Doctors During RG Kar Hospital Case Hearing

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: December 15, 2024 1:04 pm
Amna Kabeer
11 months ago
Share
Supreme Court Expresses Concern Over 'Inhuman Working Hours' Of Resident Doctors During RG Kar Hospital Case Hearing
Supreme Court Expresses Concern Over 'Inhuman Working Hours' Of Resident Doctors During RG Kar Hospital Case Hearing
SHARE

In a hearing concerning the RG Kar Hospital rape-murder case, the Supreme Court of India voiced significant concern. It was over the grueling work schedules faced by resident doctors nationwide. The bench consisted of Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra. They highlighted the issue of “inhuman working hours,” particularly the practice of some doctors working 36-hour. This extends to even 48-hour shifts, calling it “inhuman” and urging immediate reform.

The Court directed the National Task Force (NTF). They were responsible for recommending uniform safety protocols for medical professionals. This is to also address the streamlining of on-duty hours for doctors. This follows the recognition of a pressing need to ensure the welfare of medical staff. They are currently subjected to these exhausting schedules.

CJI DY Chandrachud emphasised the importance of considering the perspectives of resident doctors. Also, other medical professionals before finalising any recommendations. To facilitate this, the Supreme Court instructed the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. They are create a dedicated portal where stakeholders can submit their concerns and suggestions directly to the NTF.

During trial

The Court also acknowledged suggestions from various intervenors. This included the potential introduction of distress call systems for doctors, particularly female professionals. It would be directly linked to nearby police stations ‍and the creation of compensation distress funds. The NTF has been asked to evaluate these suggestions as part of its mandate.

In response to safety concerns, Advocate Tanvi Dubey, representing the Federation of All India Medical Association (FAIMA) and the National Federation of Resident Doctors of AIIMS, conveyed that while resident doctors are willing to return to work, they are apprehensive due to inadequate safety measures at their workplaces. The Court took note of these concerns and directed the Union Ministry of Health to consult with the Chief Secretaries of States and Directors General of Police to implement interim safety measures for doctors.

The Court stipulated that these consultations be completed within a week, with appropriate actions taken by state governments within two weeks thereafter. Additionally, the Supreme Court issued further directives to state governments, cautioning against any punitive actions towards protesting doctors and ensuring that peaceful protests are allowed in accordance with the law.

Lastly, the Court criticised the West Bengal police for shortcomings in their investigation of the RG Kar Hospital case, underscoring the need for thorough and effective inquiry in such serious matters.

You Might Also Like

Delay in Reporting POCSO Offence Not a Crime: Delhi HC

Employer’s Financial Position Strong factor in Determining Wage Structure of Employees: Supreme Court

Engaged In Sexually Explicit Discussions On The Show: Gauhati High Court Grants Interim Anticipatory Bail To YouTuber Ashish Chanchlani

Gujarat High Court Issues Notices To Times Of India and Indian Express Editors Over Misrepresentation Of Court Proceedings

Convicts of Heinous Crimes Still Entitled to Basic Legal Protections: Supreme Court Overturns Death Sentence Due to Unfair Trial

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Uttar Pradesh Map Supreme Court Rebukes UP Principal Secretary Over False Affidavit In Remission Case
Next Article Supreme Court Rules On Balancing Surety Requirements with Personal Liberty In Multiple Bail Cases Supreme Court Rules On Balancing Surety Requirements with Personal Liberty In Multiple Bail Cases
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Divorce Laws In India: What Every NRI Should Know
Bombay High CourtMarriage and DivorceNews

Suicide Threats by Spouse Amount to Cruelty for Divorce: Bombay HC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Having Knowledge But No Intent To Kill Amounts To Culpable Homicide, MP HC Convicts Man Over Wife’s Death
Child Custody Based On Current Condition And Not Uncertain Future: Patna HC
Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail To OAS Officer Bijay Ketan Sahoo In Money Laundering Case
SC/ST Act: Intellectual Property Loss Compensation Upheld by Supreme Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Narcotics & Drugs

Manufacture and Sale of Drugs Without a License Under Drugs And Cosmetics Act (Section 18)

Narcotics & Drugs

Drugs and Cosmetics Act: Key Definitions You Must Know (Section 3)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?