By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: CrPC Section 359: Order to Pay Costs in Non-Cognizable Cases
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > CrPC > CrPC Section 359: Order to Pay Costs in Non-Cognizable Cases
CrPC

CrPC Section 359: Order to Pay Costs in Non-Cognizable Cases

Apni Law
Last updated: May 31, 2024 10:18 pm
Apni Law
1 year ago
Share
SHARE

CrPC Section 359: Order to Pay Costs in Non-Cognizable Cases

1. State the Code:

Section 359 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) deals with the power of a Magistrate to order payment of costs in non-cognizable cases.

2. Explanation:

This section empowers a Magistrate to order a complainant to pay costs to the accused in a non-cognizable case, if the Magistrate finds the case to be frivolous or vexatious. A non-cognizable case is an offense that the police cannot arrest a person for without a warrant.

The Magistrate can order the payment of costs to compensate the accused for the expenses incurred by them in defending the case.

3. Illustration:

Imagine a scenario where someone files a complaint against their neighbor alleging theft, which is a non-cognizable offense. If the Magistrate finds the complaint to be baseless and without merit, they can order the complainant to pay costs to the accused for the legal expenses they incurred.

4. Common Questions and Answers:

Q: What is considered frivolous or vexatious?

A: A case is considered frivolous or vexatious if it lacks any reasonable basis and is intended to harass or annoy the accused.

Q: Who decides whether a case is frivolous or vexatious?

A: The Magistrate hearing the case has the discretion to determine if the case is frivolous or vexatious.

Q: What are the factors considered by the Magistrate?

A: The Magistrate considers factors such as the evidence presented, the conduct of the complainant, and the nature of the allegations.

Q: Can the Magistrate order costs even if the accused is acquitted?

A: Yes, the Magistrate can still order costs even if the accused is acquitted, if they find the case was frivolous or vexatious.

Q: How much can the Magistrate order as costs?

A: The amount of costs ordered is at the discretion of the Magistrate and is determined based on the expenses incurred by the accused.

You Might Also Like

Section 239 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Court May Alter Charge.

Section 246 CrPC: Procedure When Accused is Not Discharged

IPC 171A: Definition of “Candidate” and “Electoral Right” in Indian Penal Code

Section 387 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Discharge Of Offender On Submission Of Apology.

Section 119 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Notice Of Forfeiture Of Property.

TAGGED:CompensationCostsCriminal LawCriminal Procedure CodeCrPCIndian LawLegal CostsNon-Cognizable OffensesOrderPaymentProcedureSection 359
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Section 357A CrPC: Victim Compensation Scheme in India – Code of Criminal Procedure
Next Article CrPC Section 365: Court of Session’s Duty to Send Findings and Sentence to District Magistrate
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court Declines Plea To Reinstate Section 377 In Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
News

Supreme Court Declines Plea To Reinstate Section 377 In Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
9 months ago
Vulgar Chatting with Other Men Amounts to Mental Cruelty: Madhya Pradesh HC
Trial Court Cannot Review Its Final Orders: Jammu and Kashmir HC
Contraband Recovery from Accused Must Be Considered Individually for Bail: J&K High Court
Supreme Court Urges Training For Police On Differentiating Cheating From Criminal Breach Of Trust
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Narcotics & Drugs

Manufacture and Sale of Drugs Without a License Under Drugs And Cosmetics Act (Section 18)

Narcotics & Drugs

Drugs and Cosmetics Act: Key Definitions You Must Know (Section 3)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?