By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Wife Entitled to Maintenance Despite Past Employment Due To Caregiving Responsibility: Delhi HC
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Family > Alimony & Maintenance > Wife Entitled to Maintenance Despite Past Employment Due To Caregiving Responsibility: Delhi HC
Alimony & MaintenanceDelhi High CourtNewsWomen Rights

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Despite Past Employment Due To Caregiving Responsibility: Delhi HC

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: May 14, 2025 6:27 pm
Amna Kabeer
2 months ago
Share
Delhi High Court
Delhi High Court
SHARE


Court Recognizes Caregiving Responsibility on Custodial Parent


The Delhi High Court ruled that a wife cannot be denied maintenance solely because she is qualified or was previously employed. The Court emphasized that caregiving responsibility, especially for a minor child, often limit a parent’s ability to work full-time.

Contents
Court Recognizes Caregiving Responsibility on Custodial ParentCase Involves Husband’s Challenge to Maintenance OrderWife Cited Childcare Duties for Job ResignationCourt Referred to Rajnesh v. Neha CaseFamily Court’s Approach Upheld, Reassessment OrderedConclusion


Case Involves Husband’s Challenge to Maintenance Order


Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma made this observation while hearing a husband’s plea. He sought revision of a family court order directing him to pay interim maintenance to his wife.


Wife Cited Childcare Duties for Job Resignation


The husband argued that the wife was highly educated and earned ₹40,000–₹45,000 per month as a teacher. He claimed she also took tuition classes. However, the wife responded that she had to quit her job to care for their minor son. She said her commute was long and no suitable jobs were available nearby.


Court Referred to Rajnesh v. Neha Case


The Court cited the Supreme Court ruling in Rajnesh v. Neha & Anr. (2021). That ruling stressed the need to consider situations where a woman leaves employment to care for children and family. The Delhi High Court noted the wife was earlier working as a guest teacher. But she left her job due to long travel and sole parenting duties.


Family Court’s Approach Upheld, Reassessment Ordered


The High Court found merit in her explanation. It upheld the Family Court’s view that she wasn’t entitled to maintenance during her employment period. However, it agreed with granting maintenance afterward based on the husband’s notional income. The husband is a practicing lawyer.
Reconsideration of Maintenance Application Ordered
The Court observed that the Family Court hadn’t reviewed the husband’s income affidavit or bank statements. It ordered a fresh assessment of the interim maintenance application. Meanwhile, the husband must continue paying maintenance as previously directed.


Conclusion


This judgment reinforces that caregiving responsibilities can justify a wife’s unemployment. Courts must assess the full context before denying maintenance.

You Might Also Like

State Employees On Central Deputation Not Eligible For Central Pension: Supreme Court

Grabbing Breasts And Dragging Amount To Aggravated Sexual Assault And Not Attempted Rape: Allahabad HC

Gujarat High Court Upholds MBBS Admission Cancellation Despite Eligibility in General Category

Supreme Court Issues Notice On Petition Against Cancellation Of NEET-SS 2024

Person Convicted Under Both POCSO And IPC Face Higher Punishment: SC

TAGGED:Child welfareDelhi High CourtDivorceEmploymentMaintenancepast employment
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article President House India Emergency Powers of the Indian Constitution Beyond Articles 352 & 356: A Guide to Articles 353, 354, 355 and 357
Next Article Need to desexualize your brain - Hypersexuality Desexualization of the Brain: Why India Must Act Now
1 Comment
  • Pingback: Mere Suspicion Of Extramarital Affair Does Not Fulfill Ground for Abetment Of Suicide: Delhi HC - ApniLaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Calcutta High Court Rules Section 354A IPC Cannot Be Applied Against Women
News

Calcutta High Court Rules Section 354A IPC Cannot Be Applied Against Women

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
11 months ago
Denying Regularization To Temporary Workers After 8 Years of Service Is Unfair, Says HP High Court
Forcing Couples To Stay Together Amount To “Mental Cruelty”, Creates Fictional Bond By Law: Punjab And Haryana HC
Garrison Engineer’s Signature On Pleadings Deemed A Curable Defect: J&K And Ladakh High Court
Impeachment of the President of India – Procedure, Grounds & Constitutional Provisions
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

High Court of Kerala

Clarification on Proof of Wills: Section 68 is the Rule, Section 69 is the Exception, Says Kerala High Court

What If Spouse Denies Participation In Proceedings Of Restitution Of Conjugal Rights?

Human Rights Courts Under the Protection of Human Rights Act: Structure and Jurisdiction (Section 30)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?