By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Ask a Lawyer
  • Find a Lawyer
  • Our Services
  • Legal News
  • Knowledge Hub
    • Bare Acts
      • BNS
      • BNSS
      • BSA
      • CrPC
      • CPC
      • DPDP
      • Hindu Marriage Act
      • Hindu Succession Act
      • The Hindu Adoptions And Maintenance Act
      • The Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act
      • IPC
      • Juvenile Justice Act
      • POCSO
      • Special Marriage Act
      • The Specific Relief Act
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
    • Legal Articles
    • Students Section
    • Job Updates
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
  • About Us
Reading: Supreme Court Expresses Concern Over ‘Inhuman Working Hours’ Of Resident Doctors During RG Kar Hospital Case Hearing
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Ask a Lawyer
  • Find a Lawyer
  • Our Services
  • Legal News
  • Knowledge Hub
  • About Us
  • Home
  • Ask a Lawyer
  • Find a Lawyer
  • Our Services
  • Legal News
  • Knowledge Hub
    • Bare Acts
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
    • Legal Articles
    • Students Section
    • Job Updates
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
  • About Us
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Supreme Court Expresses Concern Over ‘Inhuman Working Hours’ Of Resident Doctors During RG Kar Hospital Case Hearing
News

Supreme Court Expresses Concern Over ‘Inhuman Working Hours’ Of Resident Doctors During RG Kar Hospital Case Hearing

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: December 15, 2024 1:04 pm
Amna Kabeer
12 months ago
Share
Supreme Court Expresses Concern Over 'Inhuman Working Hours' Of Resident Doctors During RG Kar Hospital Case Hearing
Supreme Court Expresses Concern Over 'Inhuman Working Hours' Of Resident Doctors During RG Kar Hospital Case Hearing
SHARE

In a hearing concerning the RG Kar Hospital rape-murder case, the Supreme Court of India voiced significant concern. It was over the grueling work schedules faced by resident doctors nationwide. The bench consisted of Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra. They highlighted the issue of “inhuman working hours,” particularly the practice of some doctors working 36-hour. This extends to even 48-hour shifts, calling it “inhuman” and urging immediate reform.

The Court directed the National Task Force (NTF). They were responsible for recommending uniform safety protocols for medical professionals. This is to also address the streamlining of on-duty hours for doctors. This follows the recognition of a pressing need to ensure the welfare of medical staff. They are currently subjected to these exhausting schedules.

CJI DY Chandrachud emphasised the importance of considering the perspectives of resident doctors. Also, other medical professionals before finalising any recommendations. To facilitate this, the Supreme Court instructed the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. They are create a dedicated portal where stakeholders can submit their concerns and suggestions directly to the NTF.

During trial

The Court also acknowledged suggestions from various intervenors. This included the potential introduction of distress call systems for doctors, particularly female professionals. It would be directly linked to nearby police stations ‍and the creation of compensation distress funds. The NTF has been asked to evaluate these suggestions as part of its mandate.

In response to safety concerns, Advocate Tanvi Dubey, representing the Federation of All India Medical Association (FAIMA) and the National Federation of Resident Doctors of AIIMS, conveyed that while resident doctors are willing to return to work, they are apprehensive due to inadequate safety measures at their workplaces. The Court took note of these concerns and directed the Union Ministry of Health to consult with the Chief Secretaries of States and Directors General of Police to implement interim safety measures for doctors.

The Court stipulated that these consultations be completed within a week, with appropriate actions taken by state governments within two weeks thereafter. Additionally, the Supreme Court issued further directives to state governments, cautioning against any punitive actions towards protesting doctors and ensuring that peaceful protests are allowed in accordance with the law.

Lastly, the Court criticised the West Bengal police for shortcomings in their investigation of the RG Kar Hospital case, underscoring the need for thorough and effective inquiry in such serious matters.

You Might Also Like

What Is the Role of State Transport Authorities Under the MV Act? (Sections 68–70)

Mere Threats Insufficient For Abetment To Suicide Charge: Calcutta High Court

Golden Hour and Good Samaritan Provisions Under the MV Act (Section 134A)

Visually Impaired Candidates are Eligible For Judicial Service: Supreme Court Strikes Down MP Rule

PMLA Court In Kolkata Dismisses ED’s Complaint Against Nalini Chidambaram In Saradha Chit Fund Scam

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Uttar Pradesh Map Supreme Court Rebukes UP Principal Secretary Over False Affidavit In Remission Case
Next Article Supreme Court Rules On Balancing Surety Requirements with Personal Liberty In Multiple Bail Cases Supreme Court Rules On Balancing Surety Requirements with Personal Liberty In Multiple Bail Cases
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
How To File A Complaint On E- Daakhil?
ActsNews

Filing a Complaint With NHRC Under the Protection of Human Rights Act (Section 13 & Procedure)

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
2 months ago
Not Informing Grounds of Arrest Violates Fundamental Rights Under Article 22: Kerala HC
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Challenging FIRs Against Gangster Lawrence Bishnoi Over Prison Interview
Supreme Court Orders Survey of Karnataka Mines for Rehabilitation Plans
What Happens if Children Refuse to Take Care of Their Parents? (Sections 5, 9, and 10)
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.
login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?