By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Kerala High Court Affirms Cartoonists’ Right To Freedom Of Expression, Quashes Case Against ‘Malayala Manorama
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Kerala High Court Affirms Cartoonists’ Right To Freedom Of Expression, Quashes Case Against ‘Malayala Manorama
News

Kerala High Court Affirms Cartoonists’ Right To Freedom Of Expression, Quashes Case Against ‘Malayala Manorama

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: April 2, 2025 9:52 pm
Amna Kabeer
11 months ago
Share
Kerala High Court Affirms Cartoonists' Right To Freedom Of Expression, Quashes Case Against 'Malayala Manorama
Kerala High Court Affirms Cartoonists' Right To Freedom Of Expression, Quashes Case Against 'Malayala Manorama
SHARE

In a landmark decision, the Kerala High Court ruled that cartoonists, as integral members of the press and media, have the right to Freedom of Expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution. The court quashed legal proceedings against the printer, publisher, editorial director, managing editor, editor, and chief editor of the Kerala news daily ‘Malayala Manorama’ under the Prevention of Insult to National Honour Act, 1971. These proceedings were initiated for allegedly insulting the National Flag through a published caricature.

Contents
ObservationVerdictCourt ruling

The case stemmed from a caricature published by Malayala Manorama during the 70th Independence Day celebrations, depicting Mahatma Gandhi and the Indian flag with a black outline on the saffron portion. Justice P.V. Kunhikrishnan noted the powerful impact of cartoons in visual commentary and their ability to engage, provoke, and inspire audiences.

Observation

“Cartoonists are part of the press and media and are entitled to the freedom of expression guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. This fundamental right allows them to express their opinions, ideas, and creativity through cartoons, subject to reasonable restrictions under Article 19(2),” the court stated. These restrictions include considerations for the sovereignty and integrity of India, state security, friendly relations with foreign states, public order, decency or morality, contempt of court, defamation, and incitement to an offense.

The complaint was lodged by the Area Committee General Secretary of the Bharatiya Janata Party. The petitioners sought the High Court’s intervention to quash the FIR and final report, asserting that Malayala Manorama had no intention of disrespecting the National Flag or Mahatma Gandhi. They argued that the cartoonist was merely exercising artistic freedom to celebrate Independence Day.

Verdict

The court clarified that caricatures often exaggerate or distort features to create humor, satire, or critique. With the power to communicate significant messages through minimal imagery. It emphasised that “insult” is a necessary element for offenses under Section 2 of the Prevention of Insult to National Honour Act. This prescribes up to three years of imprisonment or a fine for insulting the National Flag or Constitution.

Since the Act does not define “insult,” the court referred to its ordinary meaning, derogatory or demeaning remarks, comments. Also, actions intended to offend or humiliate. The court stated, “The Act aims to prevent insults to national honor. Thus, requiring deliberate intent to insult for its provisions to apply.”

The court found no such intent in the publication by Malayala Manorama. It featured the caricature alongside articles celebrating Indian Independence. It praised the cartoonist and the publication for their contribution to the Independence Day edition. Thus, criticizing the complaint as hypercritical and focused on negatives.

Court ruling

Ultimately, the court ruled that an offense under Section 2 of the Act necessitates an act. This is committed with the intent to insult the National Flag, which was not evident in this case. The court concluded, The offense is applicable when a person publicly or in view of the public commits acts. This includes burning, mutilating, defacing, or otherwise showing disrespect to the National Flag.

As a result, the court quashed the proceedings against the petitioners. Reinforcing the protection of freedom of expression for cartoonists and media professionals.

You Might Also Like

Can A Woman Be Charged With Penetrative Sexual Assault Under The POCSO Act?

Husband’s Unexplained Relationship with Woman Is Cruelty: Punjab And Haryana HC

Legal Analysis: Arresting Women at Night – Rights & Exceptions

Two Consenting Adults Free to Live Together Without Marriage Despite Of Religious Differences: Allahabad HC

Supreme Court Criticises Poor Conditions In Assam’s Detention Centers, Orders Fresh Review

TAGGED:cartoonfreedom of expressionFreedom of SpeechJournalismKeralaKerala High CourtRight to Information
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Supreme Court Rules Against High Enrollment Fees By State Bar Councils Supreme Court Rules Against High Enrollment Fees By State Bar Councils
Next Article Supreme Court Directs Uttarakhand To Decide On Patanjali's Ayurvedic Products Within Two Weeks Supreme Court Directs Uttarakhand To Decide On Patanjali’s Ayurvedic Products Within Two Weeks
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court BNSS Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
News

Delhi High Court Interprets Section 531(2)(a) Of BNSS 2023, Emphasises Applicability To Pending Appeals

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
12 months ago
Supreme Court Orders Construction Of Inclusive Toilets In Court Premises
Supreme Court: Non-Mention Of Background In Termination Order Doesn’t Exempt It From Scrutiny
Supreme Court Issues Notice To Union Government Over Blood Donation Guidelines For Gay Men
Silence of Minor Victim During Cross Examination Not Grounds for Acquittal Of Accused: SC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Humayun Merchant In Money Laundering Case

Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Cannot Be Invoked Unless Clear Evidence Of Miscarriage Of Justice: J&K HC

Information Technology Act Of 2000: Key Provisions, Responsibilities, And Amendments

Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, Penalizes Publication of Sexually Explicit Material in Electronic Form

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?