By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Challenging FIRs Against Gangster Lawrence Bishnoi Over Prison Interview
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Challenging FIRs Against Gangster Lawrence Bishnoi Over Prison Interview
News

Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Challenging FIRs Against Gangster Lawrence Bishnoi Over Prison Interview

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: March 29, 2025 2:58 pm
Amna Kabeer
10 months ago
Share
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Challenging FIRs Against Gangster Lawrence Bishnoi Over Prison Interview
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Challenging FIRs Against Gangster Lawrence Bishnoi Over Prison Interview
SHARE

The Supreme Court bench, comprising Justices Bela M. Trivedi and Satish Chandra Sharma, has dismissed a plea challenging the FIRs filed against gangster Lawrence Bishnoi. These FIRs were initiated following a directive from the Punjab and Haryana High Court concerning an interview Bishnoi gave to a private TV channel while being held in high-security Bathinda jail.

Contents
BackgroundHistoryObservation

The High Court’s directive was based on findings from a special investigation team (SIT) probing how Bishnoi, incarcerated in a high-security facility, managed to appear in two televised interviews. The interviews, allegedly conducted over a video call, raised significant concerns about the use of mobile phones by inmates.

Background

Bishnoi, currently detained in Sabarmati jail, is implicated in the murder of Punjab singer Sidhu Moosewala, which occurred on May 29, 2022. Punjab police allege that Bishnoi orchestrated the murder from Tihar jail, where he is held under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999. Bishnoi has approximately 57 FIRs against him, including charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.

A plea for an investigation into the interviews was withdrawn from the Punjab and Haryana High Court last year. Punjab DGP Gaurav Yadav stated that the interviews were not recorded in any state jails. In March 2023, the Punjab government informed the High Court that a committee had been formed to investigate the interviews’ circumstances.

History

In November 2023, the High Court took suo moto cognizance of the use of mobile phones by inmates. They sought measures to prevent the entry of prohibited items into jails. The court criticised the committee investigating Bishnoi’s interviews for its lack of progress. Subsequently, the ADGP (Prisons) Punjab, a committee member, was directed to investigate Bishnoi’s access to mobile phones in prison. This directive followed a protection plea from a military contractor who alleged threats from Bishnoi during a conference call.

In December 2023, the ADGP (Prison) submitted a report concluding that it was highly improbable. The interviews were conducted in any Punjab jails or when Bishnoi was in police custody within the state. The report also indicated Bishnoi was not in Haryana during the interviews. He was being transported for other cases outside Punjab and Haryana.

The ADGP (Prison) mentioned that authorities have requested the removal of the interview from the public domain. The committee has implemented several security measures. This is including jammers, CCTV cameras, body scanners. Also, boundary nets to prevent mobile phone smuggling, and staff augmentation, as the current workforce operates at 60% capacity.

Observation

The High Court also established a three-member SIT. It was led by Prabodh Kumar IPS, Special DGP of the Punjab State Human Rights Commission. They are to investigate the interviews and determine the officials’ accountability. It directed that FIRs be lodged in connection with the interviews.

You Might Also Like

Denial of Education Amounts to Mental Cruelty: MP High Court Grants Divorce

Marriage No Defence Under POCSO Act: Madras HC

Delhi High Court Transfers Investigation Of Faizan’s Death To CBI

No Need to Prove Negligence for Compensation Under Section 163-A: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal’s ED Custody Extended in Liquor Policy Scam: Key Updates

TAGGED:bailinterviewLawrence bigamousPleaPrisonSupreme Court
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Delhi Court Grants Bail To Activist Medha Patkar In Defamation Case Filed By Lieutenant Governor VK Saxena Delhi Court Grants Bail To Activist Medha Patkar In Defamation Case Filed By Lieutenant Governor VK Saxena
Next Article Supreme Court of India Supreme Court Rules Out Entertainment Tax On Internet Service For Cinema Ticket Bookings
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court of India
CriminalNewsSupreme Court

Person Convicted Under Both POCSO And IPC Face Higher Punishment: SC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
2 months ago
Deciphering SEBI’s New Framework: Navigating Short-Selling Dynamics in the Indian Stock Market
Muslim Divorced Woman Entitled to Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.PC If Husband Never Made Provision For Livelihood During Iddat Period: Patna HC
Not Informing Grounds of Arrest Violates Fundamental Rights Under Article 22: Kerala HC
Supreme Court Declines Patanjali Ayurved’s Apology, Warns Baba Ramdev of Perjury Proceedings in Contempt Case
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.
login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?