By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Abetment Of Suicide Charges Must Not Be Used Casually: Supreme Court Of India
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Abetment Of Suicide Charges Must Not Be Used Casually: Supreme Court Of India
NewsSupreme Court

Abetment Of Suicide Charges Must Not Be Used Casually: Supreme Court Of India

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: June 22, 2025 3:04 pm
Amna Kabeer
6 months ago
Share
Abetment Of Suicide Charges Must Not Be Used Casually: Supreme Court Of India
Abetment Of Suicide Charges Must Not Be Used Casually: Supreme Court Of India
SHARE

Avoidance of Abetment Of Suicide:

The Supreme Court of India has ruled that individuals should not casually apply abetment of suicide charges under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) to comfort grieving families. The top court emphasized that investigating agencies must avoid misuse of this provision.

Contents
Avoidance of Abetment Of Suicide:Key Ruling by Supreme CourtCase Overview


Key Ruling by Supreme Court


A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and K V Viswanathan highlighted the rampant misuse of Section 306 IPC. They stated that police should not invoke the charge mechanically without proper grounds. Courts must also act with caution, avoiding a “play-it-safe” approach while framing charges.
The bench clarified that to invoke Section 306 IPC, there must be clear evidence of instigation or facilitation of the suicide by the accused. One should not mistake hyperbolic exchanges or ordinary disagreements for provocation.


Case Overview


The judgment came in response to a plea by Mahendra Awase, accused of harassing a person who died by suicide. A suicide note mentioned Awase, alleging harassment over loan repayment. However, the Supreme Court found no evidence that Awase actively instigated the suicide or created circumstances leaving no other option for the deceased.
The court noted a two-month delay in filing the FIR. It is ruled that the case did not meet the threshold for charges under Section 306 IPC.

You Might Also Like

Supreme Court Orders Jamia Milia Islamia to Regularize Teachers, Upholds UGC Regulations

Congress MLA Sukhpal Singh Khaira’s Bail Stands As Supreme Court Rejects ED’s Plea

Capital Punishment Needs To Be Rarest of Rare Case: Madhya Pradesh HC Replaces Death Penalty with 25-Year Imprisonment in POCSO Case

Supreme Court Urges Training For Police On Differentiating Cheating From Criminal Breach Of Trust

Lawyer Urges Supreme Court to Mandate Elections with Ballot Papers Instead of EVMs

TAGGED:AbetmentEvidenceIPC 306SuicideSupreme Court
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Muslim Woman Can Claim Damages From Bigamy Marriage, Rules Madras High Court Muslim Woman Can Claim Damages From Bigamy Marriage, Rules Madras High Court
Next Article Retired Kerala Judge Loses ₹90 Lakh In Share Trading Scam Retired Kerala Judge Loses ₹90 Lakh In Share Trading Scam
1 Comment
  • Pingback: Harassment Must Be Severe Enough To Take Their Own Life: SC

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Commenting On Someone's Hair Not Sexual Harassement Under PoSH Act
Bombay High CourtNewsPOCSO & Sexual Crimes

Commenting On Someone’s Hair At Workplace Not Sexual Harassement Under PoSH Act: Bombay HC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Supreme Court Dismisses Petition For Remission, Imposes ₹10,000 Fine For Suppression Of Facts
Supreme Court Criticises Poor Conditions In Assam’s Detention Centers, Orders Fresh Review
Online Product Listings Can Be Claimed By Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Rules
Punjab And Haryana High Court Criticises ED’s Interrogation Practices In Surender Panwar Case
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Section 149 – Code of Civil Procedure – Power To Make Up Deficiency Of Court-Fees.

Section 148A – Code of Civil Procedure – Right To Lodge A Caveat.

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?