By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Nine Convicted In Witchcraft Murder Case Have Death Sentence Commuted By Orissa High Court
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Criminal > Nine Convicted In Witchcraft Murder Case Have Death Sentence Commuted By Orissa High Court
CriminalHigh CourtNews

Nine Convicted In Witchcraft Murder Case Have Death Sentence Commuted By Orissa High Court

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: January 24, 2025 12:34 am
Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Share
Orissa High Court
Orissa High Court
SHARE

The Orissa High Court on January 15 commuted the death sentences of nine individuals convicted for the 2016 murder of three family members accused of witchcraft. The Division Bench of Justice Sangam Kumar Sahoo and Justice Radha Krishna Pattanaik reduced the punishment to life imprisonment, citing the possibility of reformation.

Contents
Case BackgroundTrial And ConvictionHigh Court’s ObservationsCompensation Awarded


Case Background


The case involved the brutal killing of three members of the Sabar family in Rayagada. The accused suspected the victims of practicing sorcery, blaming them for illnesses in the village. After torturing the victims, the accused assaulted them with lathis and buried their bodies.
A Division Bench comprising Justices Sangam Kumar Sahoo and Radha Krishna Pattanaik delivered the verdict. The witness of the attack lodged an FIR. The police charged the accused under multiple sections of the IPC and the Odisha Prevention of Witch Hunting Act, 2013.


Trial And Conviction


The trial court convicted the accused based on eyewitness testimony and circumstantial evidence. It deemed the crime as “rarest of rare” and imposed the death penalty.


High Court’s Observations


The High Court ruled that the trial court failed to consider mitigating circumstances before awarding the death penalty. Reports from prison authorities showed the accused had good behavior and potential for reformation.
The court clarified that life imprisonment would extend until the end of their natural lives without the possibility of remission.


Compensation Awarded


The court directed compensation of ₹30,00,000 to the victims’ family under the Odisha Victim Compensation Scheme.

You Might Also Like

Empowering Self-Representation: Laws, Principles And Inspiring Precedents

Pressing Lips of a Minor May Outrage Modesty But Doesn’t Necessarily Constitute Aggravated Sexual Assault: Delhi HC

Why Are Innocent People’s Bank Accounts Being Frozen in Cyber Crime Investigations?

Earning Men Can’t Claim ‘No Resources’ to Avoid Maintenance: Kerala HC

Mere Suspicion Of Extramarital Affair Does Not Fulfill Ground for Abetment Of Suicide: Delhi HC

TAGGED:Criminal LawCriminal ProcedureLaw EnforcementmurderSupreme Court
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Punjab and Haryana High Court FIR Against UN Official Dismissed For Alleged COVID-19 Spread: P&H High Court
Next Article Delhi High Court case Right To Speedy Trial Not Automatic For Bail: Delhi High Court Denies Relief To Gangster Neeraj Bawaniya
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
India's Got Latent Controversy
NewsSupreme Court

Plea Against Multiple FIRs: Supreme Court Issues Notice On Ashish Chanchlani

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Supreme Court Criticises Railways for Appointing Employees Based On Forged Documents
Mediation Is Only Permissible When Both Parties Agree To It: SC
Gujarat High Court Rebukes Railways Over Lion Deaths from Train Hits
Second Wife Not Liable Under Section 494 IPC in Bigamy Case: Chhattisgarh High Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?