Code
95. Compensation for obtaining arrest, attachment or injunction on insufficient grounds.—
(1) Where, in any suit in which an arrest or attachment has been effected or a temporary injunction granted under the last preceding section—
(a) it appears to the Court that such arrest, attachment or injunction was applied for on insufficient grounds, or
(b) the suit of the plaintiff fails and it appears to the Court that there was no reasonable or probable ground for instituting the same,
the defendant may apply to the Court, and the Court may, upon such application, award against the plaintiff by its order such amount not exceeding fifty thousand rupees, as it deems reasonable compensation to the defendant for the expense or injury (including injury to reputation) caused to him:
Provided that a Court shall not award under this section an amount exceeding the limits of its pecuniary jurisdiction.
(2) An order determining any such application shall bar any suit for compensation in respect of such arrest, attachment or injunction.
Explanation of Section 95 CPC
Section 95 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 protects defendants from suffering harm due to the improper use of interim remedies such as arrest, attachment of property, or temporary injunctions.
The law grants courts significant powers under Section 94 CPC to issue protective orders during litigation. However, these powers can sometimes be misused by plaintiffs to harass opponents or gain an unfair advantage.
To prevent such abuse, Section 95 CPC allows the court to award compensation when it finds that interim relief was obtained without sufficient grounds or when the lawsuit itself was filed without a reasonable basis.
Thus, the provision acts as a safeguard against frivolous or malicious litigation.
Purpose of Section 95 CPC
The primary purpose of Section 95 CPC is to discourage misuse of judicial processes.
Interim orders such as attachment of property or temporary injunctions can cause serious financial loss, business disruption, and reputational damage.
If parties are allowed to obtain such orders recklessly, the legal process may become a tool of harassment rather than justice.
Therefore, Section 95 CPC ensures accountability by allowing courts to compensate defendants who suffer because of unjustified legal actions.
When Can Compensation Be Awarded?
The court may award compensation in the following situations.
Interim Relief Was Obtained on Insufficient Grounds
If the plaintiff secured an arrest order, property attachment, or temporary injunction without adequate justification, the court may award compensation to the affected defendant.
The court must be satisfied that the application lacked sufficient legal basis.
The Suit Ultimately Fails
Compensation may also be awarded when:
- The plaintiff’s suit is dismissed; and
- The court concludes that there was no reasonable or probable ground for filing the suit.
Mere failure of the suit is not enough. The court must additionally find that the claim lacked a reasonable foundation.
What Compensation Can Be Awarded?
The court may award reasonable compensation for:
Financial Loss
The defendant may recover expenses incurred because of the wrongful order.
Business Loss
Losses caused by attachment of property or interruption of business activities may be considered.
Injury to Reputation
Section 95 CPC specifically recognizes damage to reputation as a compensable injury.
This is particularly important where wrongful allegations have affected the defendant’s standing in society or business.
Maximum Compensation Under Section 95 CPC
The court may award compensation up to ₹50,000.
However, the compensation cannot exceed the pecuniary jurisdiction of the court granting the relief.
This statutory limit applies even if the actual loss suffered by the defendant is greater.
Bar on Separate Suit
Sub-section (2) contains an important restriction.
Once the court decides an application for compensation under Section 95 CPC, the defendant cannot file a separate suit seeking compensation for the same arrest, attachment, or injunction.
This prevents multiple proceedings arising from the same grievance.
Importance of Section 95 CPC
Section 95 CPC promotes fairness and responsible litigation.
While courts must have the power to grant urgent interim relief, parties should not be allowed to misuse these remedies for personal advantage.
The provision balances the interests of both plaintiffs and defendants by ensuring that wrongful interim orders have legal consequences.
Consequently, Section 95 CPC helps maintain public confidence in the judicial system and discourages abuse of court processes.
Illustration
Illustration 1
A plaintiff obtains an attachment order against a business owner’s property by making exaggerated claims.
The suit is later dismissed, and the court finds that there were no reasonable grounds for the attachment.
The defendant may seek compensation under Section 95 CPC.
Illustration 2
A company obtains a temporary injunction preventing a competitor from carrying on business activities.
During trial, the court discovers that the injunction was obtained on insufficient grounds.
The affected competitor may be awarded compensation for losses and reputational harm.
Illustration 3
A plaintiff seeks the arrest of a defendant before judgment, claiming that the defendant intends to abscond.
The allegation turns out to be false and unsupported by evidence.
The court may award compensation to the defendant under Section 95 CPC.
Common Questions and Answers
1. What is the purpose of Section 95 CPC?
Answer:
Section 95 CPC allows courts to award compensation when arrest, attachment, or injunction orders were obtained on insufficient grounds or when a suit was filed without reasonable cause.
2. Can compensation be awarded merely because the plaintiff loses the case?
Answer:
No. The court must also find that there was no reasonable or probable ground for instituting the suit.
3. Does Section 95 CPC cover injury to reputation?
Answer:
Yes. The section expressly permits compensation for injury to reputation in addition to financial loss and expenses.
4. Can a separate suit be filed after obtaining compensation under Section 95 CPC?
Answer:
No. Once the court determines the compensation application, a separate suit regarding the same arrest, attachment, or injunction is barred.
Conclusion
Section 95 CPC serves as an important safeguard against the misuse of interim judicial remedies. By allowing compensation for wrongful arrest, attachment of property, or temporary injunctions, the provision protects defendants from unnecessary harm and discourages frivolous litigation. It reinforces the principle that legal processes should be used for the administration of justice rather than as instruments of harassment. As a result, Section 95 CPC plays a vital role in ensuring fairness, accountability, and balance in civil proceedings.
.
