By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Inducing Sexual Intercourse Under False Promise of Marriage Not Applicable For Married Women Under BNS Section 69 and 84: Kerala HC
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > BNS > Inducing Sexual Intercourse Under False Promise of Marriage Not Applicable For Married Women Under BNS Section 69 and 84: Kerala HC
BNSKerala High Court

Inducing Sexual Intercourse Under False Promise of Marriage Not Applicable For Married Women Under BNS Section 69 and 84: Kerala HC

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: July 5, 2025 1:05 pm
Amna Kabeer
2 days ago
Share
High Court of Kerala
High Court of Kerala
SHARE

The Kerala High Court has granted regular bail to a man booked under Sections 69 and 84 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023. He was accused of inducing a married woman into a sexual relationship under a false promise of marriage. The prosecution alleged that the man later threatened to publish her photos and videos and borrowed ₹2.5 lakhs from her. Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas questioned the applicability of BNS Section 69 in this case, as the complainant was already married. The Court observed that a false promise of marriage cannot exist when both parties are aware of a subsisting marriage. Citing Anil Kumar v. State of Kerala (2021) and Ranjith v. State of Kerala (2022), the Court stated that it is difficult to determine consent at this stage.

Since Section 84 is a bailable offence, the Court ruled that further detention was unnecessary. It clarified that the observations were only for deciding the bail and not for the trial. Hence, the bail application was allowed.

You Might Also Like

Section 225 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Threat Of Injury To Induce Person To Refrain From Applying For Protection To Public Servant.

Section 116 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Grievous Hurt.

Section 325 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Mischief By Killing Or Maiming Animal.

Section 43 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Commencement And Continuance Of Right Of Private Defence Of Property.

Section 268 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Personation Of Assessor.

TAGGED:BnsBNS 69Coercionfalse marriage promisesfalse promiseKerala High CourtMarried Women
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Land Acquisition: Procedures, Compensation, And Legal Battles Land Acquisition under Public Private Ownership Model Attracts Benefits: Calcutta High Court
Next Article Right to Maintenance For Women Widowed Daughter-in-law Can Claim Maintenance from In-laws Under HAMA, Rules Jharkhand High Court
1 Comment
  • Pingback: Widowed Daughter-in-law Can Claim Maintenance from In-laws Under HAMA, Rules Jharkhand High Court - ApniLaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court of India
News

Supreme Court Grants Leave In Caste-Based Survey Challenge, Hearing Set For September 4

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
12 months ago
Supreme Court Halts Contempt Proceedings Against DDA Vice Chairman, Seeks CJI’s Clarification
Supreme Court Rebukes UP Principal Secretary Over False Affidavit In Remission Case
Child’s Education Should Not Be Disrupted Due To Parental Dispute: Madras High Court Directs Passport Renewal for Minor in the U.S.
SC or ST Act: Caste Abuse Must Occur In Public View To Be An Offense, Rules Supreme Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Humayun Merchant In Money Laundering Case

Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Cannot Be Invoked Unless Clear Evidence Of Miscarriage Of Justice: J&K HC

Information Technology Act Of 2000: Key Provisions, Responsibilities, And Amendments

Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, Penalizes Publication of Sexually Explicit Material in Electronic Form

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?