By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Compensation for Deceased’s Negligent Driving: Supreme Court
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Acts > Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Compensation for Deceased’s Negligent Driving: Supreme Court
ActsMotor Accident & DrivingSupreme Court

Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Compensation for Deceased’s Negligent Driving: Supreme Court

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: July 5, 2025 1:05 pm
Amna Kabeer
1 week ago
Share
How To File A Case Under The Motor Vehicles Act
How To File A Case Under The Motor Vehicles Act
SHARE

The Supreme Court on July 2 reaffirmed that legal heirs of a person who dies due to their own negligent driving cannot claim compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. A bench of Justices PS Narasimha and R Mahadevan upheld the Karnataka High Court’s decision, which denied compensation to the family of the deceased. The deceased died in a car crash while driving a Fiat Linea rashly and at high speed. His wife, son, and parents filed a compensation claim of ₹80 lakhs before the MACT. The Tribunal rejected their plea, ruling the deceased was the tortfeasor and hence, his heirs had no right to compensation. The High Court cited Ningamma v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. to support its stance that one cannot benefit from their own wrongdoing. The appellants argued that since the deceased wasn’t the car’s owner, the insurer should cover the loss. However, the Court, citing Minu B. Mehta v. Balkrishna Nayan, clarified that a borrower steps into the owner’s shoes and cannot seek compensation for self-inflicted harm. The Supreme Court found no merit in the appeal and dismissed it.

You Might Also Like

Facing Charges for Cannabis? Know the Punishment Under Section 20 Of NDPS Act

Harbouring or Financing Drug Offences: Section 27A of NDPS Act in Focus

Protection Orders Under Section 18 Of Domestic Violence Act: How They Help Victims

What Is Considered Domestic Violence Under Section 3 Of Domestic Violence Act?

Plea Against MM Lawrence’s Body Donation For Medical Research Rejected By Supreme Court

TAGGED:Motor accidentMotor accident claimsMotor actMotor claimsMotor vehicleMotor Vehicles ActNegligent DrivingSupreme Court
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Divorce Under The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Mental Illness Grounds Under Hindu Marriage Act Requires Strong Proof: Jharkhand High Court
Next Article Land Acquisition: Procedures, Compensation, And Legal Battles Land Acquisition under Public Private Ownership Model Attracts Benefits: Calcutta High Court
1 Comment
  • Pingback: Land Acquisition under Public Private Ownership Model Attracts Benefits: Calcutta High Court - ApniLaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Passport
CriminalDelhi High CourtNews

Foreign Nationality Not a Ground to Deny Bail Under NDPS Act: Delhi HC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
2 months ago
Supreme Court Declines Plea To Reinstate Section 377 In Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
Contraband Recovery from Accused Must Be Considered Individually for Bail: J&K High Court
Deciphering SEBI’s New Framework: Navigating Short-Selling Dynamics in the Indian Stock Market
Should Convicted Politicians Be Allowed to Make Laws? : SC Questions
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Section 121 – Code of Civil Procedure – Effect Of Rules In First Schedule.

Section 120 – Code of Civil Procedure – Provisions Not Applicable To High Court In Original Civil Jurisdiction.

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?