By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Supreme Court Upholds Renaming Of Aurangabad And Osmanabad
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Supreme Court Upholds Renaming Of Aurangabad And Osmanabad
News

Supreme Court Upholds Renaming Of Aurangabad And Osmanabad

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: December 22, 2024 10:06 pm
Amna Kabeer
11 months ago
Share
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
SHARE

On July 2, the Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition (SLP). It challenged the Bombay High Court’s decision to uphold Maharashtra’s notifications renaming Aurangabad and Osmanabad to Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar and Dharashiv. The Bench of Justices Hrishikesh Roy and S.V.N Bhatti declined to interfere with the High Court’s ruling.

Multiple petitions were initially filed in the Bombay High Court contesting the renaming of both cities and their revenue areas. The Union Ministry of Home Affairs approved the renaming of Aurangabad on February 24, 2023. This is following its earlier approval for Osmanabad on February 7, 2023.

On February 24, 2023, the Maharashtra government issued notifications formally changing the cities’ names, while the process for renaming the revenue areas was still incomplete. A draft notification was also published that day, inviting public objections to the proposed renaming of the revenue areas.

The High Court, on August 30, 2023, dismissed a batch of petitions opposing the renaming of the revenue areas, as the new names had not yet been formally notified. The challenge to the cities’ new names, however, remained. On September 15, 2023, the renaming of the revenue areas was formally notified, prompting new petitions against the changes.

During trial

Public Interest Litigations (PILs) argued that the renaming was politically motivated and incited religious discord. One petitioner alleged a campaign to change the names of all cities in Maharashtra with Muslim names. The Maharashtra government denied this, stating that naming the city after a respected figure like Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj did not carry religious connotations.

The High Court found no legal issues with the renaming notifications and refused to interfere. “The impugned notifications renaming Aurangabad and Osmanabad as Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar and Dharashiv, respectively, do not suffer from any illegality or legal vice. Therefore, no interference is warranted. The petitions are hereby dismissed without costs.”

The petitioners then appealed to the Supreme Court, seeking to overturn the High Court’s decision and requesting a stay on the order. The current petition was filed through Advocate on Record Pulkit Agarwal.

The Supreme Court’s dismissal upholds the renaming of Aurangabad and Osmanabad, affirming the legality of the Maharashtra government’s notifications.

You Might Also Like

Supreme Court Issues Notice On Petition Against Cancellation Of NEET-SS 2024

Police Must Uphold Human Dignity While Maintaining Law, Says Madras High Court

Garrison Engineer’s Signature On Pleadings Deemed A Curable Defect: J&K And Ladakh High Court

Cheque Will Be Invalid Due To Single Signature On Joint Account: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Supreme Court Criticises Poor Conditions In Assam’s Detention Centers, Orders Fresh Review

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Supreme Court Seeks Government Response On AYUSH Drug Approval Rules Amid Patanjali Misleading Ads Case Supreme Court Seeks Government Response On AYUSH Drug Approval Rules Amid Patanjali Misleading Ads Case
Next Article Supreme Court Questions Fresh SLP Filing After Withdrawal Without Leave, Refers Matter To Larger Bench Supreme Court Questions Fresh SLP Filing After Withdrawal Without Leave, Refers Matter To Larger Bench
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court Denies Interim Relief to Kerala in Dispute Over Additional Borrowing
NewsSupreme Court

Supreme Court Denies Interim Relief to Kerala in Dispute Over Additional Borrowing

Apni Law
By Apni Law
1 year ago
Dowry Demand Not Necessary To Prove Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC: Supreme Court
CJI Chandrachud Calls For Inclusive Policies For Persons With Disabilities
Conviction Under Section 498A Not Limited to Dowry Harassment But Also Cruelty: Madras HC
Supreme Court Upholds Executing Court’s Decision To Extend Payment Time In Contract Case
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Humayun Merchant In Money Laundering Case

Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Cannot Be Invoked Unless Clear Evidence Of Miscarriage Of Justice: J&K HC

Information Technology Act Of 2000: Key Provisions, Responsibilities, And Amendments

Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, Penalizes Publication of Sexually Explicit Material in Electronic Form

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?