By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Supreme Court Considers Transferring CLAT-2025 Petitions To Punjab And Haryana High Court
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Supreme Court Considers Transferring CLAT-2025 Petitions To Punjab And Haryana High Court
High CourtNewsSupreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Transferring CLAT-2025 Petitions To Punjab And Haryana High Court

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: January 24, 2025 8:43 pm
Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Share
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
SHARE

The Supreme Court considers transferring on January 15 petitions challenging the CLAT-2025 results to the Punjab and Haryana High Court. These petitions currently span multiple High Courts, including Delhi, Karnataka, Jharkhand, Rajasthan, Bombay, Madhya Pradesh, and Punjab & Haryana.

Contents
SC Considers Consolidation Of CLAT-2025 CasesStudents Advocate For Delhi High CourtSC Issues Notice For February HearingBackground On CLAT-2025 Disputes


SC Considers Consolidation Of CLAT-2025 Cases


A bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna and Justice PV Sanjay Kumar heard transfer petitions filed by the Consortium of National Law Universities. The Consortium sought the consolidation and transfer of cases to either the Supreme Court or a specific High Court for efficient resolution.
CJI Khanna stated that transferring the cases to a single High Court would ensure a faster and unified resolution. He noted the first petition was filed at the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which has a strong disposal rate. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta initially suggested the Karnataka High Court, but the bench leaned toward the Punjab and Haryana High Court.


Students Advocate For Delhi High Court


Lawyers representing students requested the transfer to the Delhi High Court. Thus, citing its earlier ruling that two CLAT-UG 2025 answers were incorrect. However, CJI Khanna humorously remarked, “Law students should not fold their hands,” as he rejected the plea.


SC Issues Notice For February Hearing


The Supreme Court issued notices to counsels from different High Courts. The matter is set for a hearing in the first week of February 2025.


Background On CLAT-2025 Disputes


In December 2024, the Delhi High Court found errors in the CLAT-UG answer key. They directed the Consortium to revise results. The Supreme Court also previously directed petitioners to approach the High Courts instead of directly challenging the CLAT-PG 2025 answer key.

You Might Also Like

Section 3 – Hindu Marriage Act – Definitions.

Supreme Court Questions Fresh SLP Filing After Withdrawal Without Leave, Refers Matter To Larger Bench

Supreme Court Petition Calls For High-Powered Committee To Investigate EVM Manipulation Allegations

Section 363 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Trial Of Persons Previously Convicted Of Offences Against Coinage, Stamp-Law Or Property.

CrPC Section 468: Limitation Period for Taking Cognizance of Offenses

TAGGED:CLATHigh CourtIndiaIndian Law
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Supreme Court Orders Construction Of Inclusive Toilets In Court Premises Supreme Court Orders Construction Of Inclusive Toilets In Court Premises
Next Article Supreme Court Acquits Brother-in-law In Dowry Death Case: Emphasizes Need For Clear Evidence Under Section 113B Supreme Court Acquits Brother-in-law In Dowry Death Case: Emphasizes Need For Clear Evidence Under Section 113B
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
High Court of Punjab & Haryana
CriminalFamilyHigh CourtMarriage and DivorceNewsPunjab & Haryana High Court

Conviction For Murder Amounts To Cruelty, Grants As Grounds For Divorce Under the Hindu Marriage Act: Punjab and Haryana High Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Conviction Under Section 498A Not Limited to Dowry Harassment But Also Cruelty: Madras HC
Call Detail Records Insufficient for Conviction Under NDPS Act: J&K High Court
Daughters Born Before 2004 Partition Cannot Claim Father’s Property: Karnataka High Court:
Motor Accident Claims / Compensation Can’t Be Reduced Merely Because Dependents Took Over Business Of Deceased : Supreme Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?