During trial
During the proceedings, Senior Advocate S. Prabhakaran, representing the Bar Council of India (BCI), mentioned that notices have already been sent to Bar Associations across the country to solicit their feedback. Justice Kant clarified that the Court’s primary concern is the implementation of necessary reforms, rather than addressing specific grievances. The Bench raised several key questions, including the criteria for admitting members to various levels of Bar Associations, from district bars to the Supreme Court, and whether a uniform or varied standard should be applied. Additionally, concerns were voiced regarding the substantial expenses involved in Bar Association elections, with suggestions for an independent regulatory body to oversee these processes. Senior Advocate Arvind Datar proposed the formulation of guidelines to address allegations of arbitrariness in membership admissions. Thus, highlighting the demand for inclusion in prestigious associations. Justice Kant also addressed issues of integrity. Hence, referencing a case in Tamil Nadu. An individual with multiple criminal cases was elected as a Bar member. A situation he wryly remarked might be seen as a qualification. The Court also touched on the lack of basic infrastructure for Bar members. It asked SCAORA to incorporate these issues in their report. The matter is set to be heard again in October. It expects that comprehensive suggestions will be gathered by then.
ApniLaw AI
Need the case law behind this point?
Ask ApniLaw AI in plain words. Every point of the answer shows the judgment paragraph or Act section behind it, with its page and paragraph number.
