By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Employer’s Financial Position Strong factor in Determining Wage Structure of Employees: Supreme Court
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Acts > Employer’s Financial Position Strong factor in Determining Wage Structure of Employees: Supreme Court
ActsNewsSupreme Court

Employer’s Financial Position Strong factor in Determining Wage Structure of Employees: Supreme Court

Apni Law
Last updated: December 5, 2024 9:23 pm
Apni Law
1 year ago
Share
Employer's Financial Position Strong factor in Determining Wage Structure of Employees: Supreme Court
Employer's Financial Position Strong factor in Determining Wage Structure of Employees: Supreme Court
SHARE

Employer’s financial position determines wage structure:

In a recent landmark ruling, the Supreme Court of India has reaffirmed the critical importance of taking into account the financial capacity of an employer when establishing the wage structure of employees. This landmark ruling overturned a Bombay High Court judgment in an industrial dispute. The High Court’s decision had partially upheld a wage revision award challenged by the employer.

The employer appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing the High Court overstepped its authority by finding facts and ignoring the company’s financial struggles. The Union countered that Article 226 empowers High Courts to decide factual issues.

The Supreme Court acknowledged High Courts’ power to review tribunal awards. However, it emphasized that the employer’s financial health is crucial in wage revisions. The Court stressed the importance of comparing industrial units while considering the employer’s financial capability.

The Court found the High Court should have returned the case to the tribunal for further examination, especially regarding the employer’s contested comparability of certain units. The Supreme Court deemed the High Court’s evaluation flawed and called for a fresh examination.

Consequently, both the tribunal’s award and the High Court judgment were set aside. The Supreme Court instructed the tribunal to re-evaluate the issue within a specific timeframe. This landmark ruling sets a precedent, reaffirming the need to consider employer financial health in determining employee wage structures.

You Might Also Like

Delhi High Court Responds to Plea Against Protests in Court Premises Over Arvind Kejriwal’s Arrest

Plea Against MM Lawrence’s Body Donation For Medical Research Rejected By Supreme Court

Convicts of Heinous Crimes Still Entitled to Basic Legal Protections: Supreme Court Overturns Death Sentence Due to Unfair Trial

Clarification on Proof of Wills: Section 68 is the Rule, Section 69 is the Exception, Says Kerala High Court

Rights & Duties of Advocates Under the Advocates Act, 1961

TAGGED:Article 226Bombay High CourtEmployer's Financial PositionIndustrial DisputeSupreme CourtTribunal AwardWage Structure
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article CJI DY Chandrachud Warns of Risks in Adoption of AI, Highlights Facial Recognition Technology CJI DY Chandrachud Warns of Risks in Adoption of AI, Highlights Facial Recognition Technology
Next Article CIC Criticizes Election Commission's Delayed Response to RTI Query on EVMs CIC Criticizes Election Commission’s Delayed Response to RTI Query on EVMs
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Uttar Pradesh Map
News

Supreme Court Rebukes UP Principal Secretary Over False Affidavit In Remission Case

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
11 months ago
Pressing Lips of a Minor May Outrage Modesty But Doesn’t Necessarily Constitute Aggravated Sexual Assault: Delhi HC
Supreme Court Upholds Right to Bail for UAPA Accused Despite Delay in Trial: Shoma Sen Case
Gujarat High Court Rebukes Railways Over Lion Deaths from Train Hits
Non-Bailable Warrants Barred In Maintenance Cases Under Section 125 CrPC: Kerala High Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Secretly Recorded Calls Is An Admissible Evidence In Divorce Cases: SC

Accident Compensation Under the MV Act: What Victims and Families Should Know (Sections 166–168)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?