By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Online Product Listings Can Be Claimed By Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Rules
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Delhi High Court > Online Product Listings Can Be Claimed By Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Rules
Delhi High CourtNews

Online Product Listings Can Be Claimed By Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Rules

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: February 6, 2025 10:18 pm
Amna Kabeer
6 months ago
Share
High Court of Delhi
High Court of Delhi
SHARE

Online Product Listings Establish Trademark Jurisdiction

Contents
Court Affirms Jurisdiction for Online Trademark Infringement CasesDefendant’s Claim of No Business in Delhi RejectedPlaintiff’s Side Of The Story Regrading DefendantOnline Listings Considered ‘Use’ Under Trademark LawCourt Dismisses Defendant’s Plea


Court Affirms Jurisdiction for Online Trademark Infringement Cases


The Delhi High Court has ruled that if a website displaying products is accessible in a specific territory, the court in that territory has jurisdiction over trademark infringement cases. Even if a business does not physically sell goods there, offering them for sale online is enough to establish jurisdiction.


Defendant’s Claim of No Business in Delhi Rejected


The case involved a trademark infringement suit filed by Johnson & Johnson Pte. Ltd. against a defendant selling ORSL electrolyte drinks. The defendant argued that its business was limited to Andhra Pradesh, Odisha, Tamil Nadu, and Telangana and did not extend to Delhi.

Plaintiff’s Side Of The Story Regrading Defendant


However, the plaintiff countered that the defendant’s products were available for purchase through third-party platforms like IndiaMart, allowing nationwide orders, including from Delhi. The plaintiff even managed to place an order from Delhi, demonstrating the defendant’s online presence in the territory.


Online Listings Considered ‘Use’ Under Trademark Law


Justice Mini Pushkarna ruled that displaying and marketing goods on an accessible website qualifies as ‘use’ under trademark law. The court stated that:
A website’s accessibility in Delhi is sufficient to establish jurisdiction, even if it later stops operations.
Goods advertised or promoted online fall under ‘use’ in relation to trademark infringement.
Even if no product is ultimately delivered, the ability to place an order proves jurisdiction.


Court Dismisses Defendant’s Plea


The court rejected the defendant’s request to dismiss the suit for lack of jurisdiction. It emphasized that advertising, promoting, or offering products for sale in a territory is enough to bring a trademark infringement case under that court’s jurisdiction.
This ruling reinforces the legal principle that businesses selling products online cannot evade legal responsibility in territories where their websites are accessible.

You Might Also Like

Muslim Divorced Woman Entitled to Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.PC If Husband Never Made Provision For Livelihood During Iddat Period: Patna HC

Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail To OAS Officer Bijay Ketan Sahoo In Money Laundering Case

Pending FIR Not A Bar For Passport Renewal: Jammu And Kashmir High Court Rules On Passport Issuance Amid Pending Investigations

Supreme Court Issues Notice On Establishing Adequate Forensic Science Labs

Supreme Court Rules Slum Rehabilitation Schemes Are Not Real Estate Projects, Emphasises Public Purpose

TAGGED:Case ManagementDelhi High CourtJurisdictionalOnlineOnlinefraud
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article High Court of Madhya Pradesh Habeas Corpus Cannot Be Used for Missing Persons Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Next Article Section 61 - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) - Criminal Conspiracy Section 61 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Criminal Conspiracy.
1 Comment
  • Pingback: How To File A Complaint Against A Defective Product Or Service - ApniLaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
High Court of Karnataka
High CourtKarnataka High CourtNews

Late Income Tax Filing Can Lead To Prosecution: Karnataka High Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
6 months ago
Sending Abusive Texts Doesn’t Amount to Stalking Under IPC Section 354D: Karnataka HC
Guest Faculty Not a ‘Workman’ Under Industrial Disputes Act : Calcutta High Court
Punjab And Haryana High Court Criticises ED’s Interrogation Practices In Surender Panwar Case
Mother Is Natural Guardian After Father’s Death, Will Be Granted Interim Custody For Child Welfare: Bombay HC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Allahabad High Court

Neglect Or Abandonment Of Elderly Parents Violate Right To Dignity Under Article 21: Allahabad HC

Supreme Court Overturns Acquittal In Cheque Bounce Case, Orders Rs. 28.5 Lakh Fine

What Is Presumption of Debt in Cheque Cases: Section 139 of Negotiable Instrument Act

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?