By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Online Product Listings Can Be Claimed By Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Rules
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Delhi High Court > Online Product Listings Can Be Claimed By Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Rules
Delhi High CourtNews

Online Product Listings Can Be Claimed By Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Rules

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: February 6, 2025 10:18 pm
Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Share
High Court of Delhi
High Court of Delhi
SHARE

Online Product Listings Establish Trademark Jurisdiction

Contents
Court Affirms Jurisdiction for Online Trademark Infringement CasesDefendant’s Claim of No Business in Delhi RejectedPlaintiff’s Side Of The Story Regrading DefendantOnline Listings Considered ‘Use’ Under Trademark LawCourt Dismisses Defendant’s Plea


Court Affirms Jurisdiction for Online Trademark Infringement Cases


The Delhi High Court has ruled that if a website displaying products is accessible in a specific territory, the court in that territory has jurisdiction over trademark infringement cases. Even if a business does not physically sell goods there, offering them for sale online is enough to establish jurisdiction.


Defendant’s Claim of No Business in Delhi Rejected


The case involved a trademark infringement suit filed by Johnson & Johnson Pte. Ltd. against a defendant selling ORSL electrolyte drinks. The defendant argued that its business was limited to Andhra Pradesh, Odisha, Tamil Nadu, and Telangana and did not extend to Delhi.

Plaintiff’s Side Of The Story Regrading Defendant


However, the plaintiff countered that the defendant’s products were available for purchase through third-party platforms like IndiaMart, allowing nationwide orders, including from Delhi. The plaintiff even managed to place an order from Delhi, demonstrating the defendant’s online presence in the territory.


Online Listings Considered ‘Use’ Under Trademark Law


Justice Mini Pushkarna ruled that displaying and marketing goods on an accessible website qualifies as ‘use’ under trademark law. The court stated that:
A website’s accessibility in Delhi is sufficient to establish jurisdiction, even if it later stops operations.
Goods advertised or promoted online fall under ‘use’ in relation to trademark infringement.
Even if no product is ultimately delivered, the ability to place an order proves jurisdiction.


Court Dismisses Defendant’s Plea


The court rejected the defendant’s request to dismiss the suit for lack of jurisdiction. It emphasized that advertising, promoting, or offering products for sale in a territory is enough to bring a trademark infringement case under that court’s jurisdiction.
This ruling reinforces the legal principle that businesses selling products online cannot evade legal responsibility in territories where their websites are accessible.

You Might Also Like

We Will Not Leave This Vacuum: Supreme Court Seeks Regulation Of Obscene Content On YouTube And Social Media

Suicide at Parental Home Doesn’t Exclude Dowry Death Charge: Delhi HC

Supreme Court Considers Transferring CLAT-2025 Petitions To Punjab And Haryana High Court

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Humayun Merchant In Money Laundering Case

Habeas Corpus Cannot Be Used for Missing Persons Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court

TAGGED:Case ManagementDelhi High CourtJurisdictionalOnlineOnlinefraud
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article High Court of Madhya Pradesh Habeas Corpus Cannot Be Used for Missing Persons Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Next Article Section 61 - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) - Criminal Conspiracy Section 61 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Criminal Conspiracy.
1 Comment
  • Pingback: How To File A Complaint Against A Defective Product Or Service - ApniLaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Gujarat High Court Rebukes Railways Over Lion Deaths from Train Hits
High CourtNews

Gujarat High Court Rebukes Railways Over Lion Deaths from Train Hits

Apni Law
By Apni Law
1 year ago
Bombay High Court Ruling: Association With Dawood Ibrahim Not Punishable Under UAPA
Old Age Pension Cannot Be Denied Due To Family Support: Madras High Court
Familial Ties Don’t Rule Out Promise Of Marriage, Says Delhi High Court
Article 21 Includes Living Free From Mental Trauma: Jammu and Kashmir High Court Allows Termination of 28-Week Pregnancy of Sexual Assault Victim
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?