The Supreme Court has raised doubts about the feasibility of separate cycle tracks to create across India. A bench of Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan was hearing a PIL filed by Davinder Singh Nagi, seeking cycle tracks nationwide.
Supreme Court’s Concerns
Justice Oka called the demand “very ambitious” and questioned the prioritization of government resources. He asked whether funds should instead address pressing issues like housing, healthcare, and education for the people with low income.
Petitioner’s Arguments
The petitioner’s counsel highlighted the lack of proper cycle tracks and cited an example near Supreme Court Gate D, where a track ends abruptly. They argued that cycle tracks could integrate with smart city projects under the Amrut Yojana without requiring additional budgets.
Justice Oka’s Remarks
The bench expressed skepticism, stating, “Smart cities become smart when basic facilities for the people whose income is below poverty threshold are provided, not just cycle tracks.” Justice Oka dismissed the idea of appointing an amicus curiae, calling the plea “too far-fetched”.
Pollution Argument Raised
The petitioner argued that cycle tracks could help reduce pollution, especially during the winter months, when Delhi-NCR faces severe air quality issues. The court acknowledged ongoing efforts to tackle air pollution in the MC Mehta case but reserved its opinion on linking cycle tracks to the issue.
Next Steps
The court granted the petitioner time to present further arguments and scheduled the next date for further hearing.
