By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: DNA Report Cannot Prove Absence of Consent in Rape Case: Delhi HC
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Delhi High Court > DNA Report Cannot Prove Absence of Consent in Rape Case: Delhi HC
Delhi High CourtIPCNews

DNA Report Cannot Prove Absence of Consent in Rape Case: Delhi HC

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: April 3, 2025 7:56 pm
Amna Kabeer
2 months ago
Share
Delhi High Court
Delhi High Court
SHARE

Court Dismisses Rape Charges Against Accused


The Delhi High Court ruled that a DNA report proving paternity does not establish the absence of consent in a rape case. The court ruled that proving sexual relations, even if resulting in pregnancy, does not establish rape unless absence of consent is proven.

Contents
Court Dismisses Rape Charges Against AccusedCase BackgroundAccusations and DefenseCourt’s ObservationsLack of Medical Evidence and Delay in ComplaintVerdict and Legal StandpointWhat Is IPC Section 376?

Case Background


The case involved a man convicted under Sections 376(2)(n) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). He challenged his conviction and the 10-year sentence imposed by the trial court. The prosecution relied on a DNA report confirming that the accused fathered the child born to the victim.

Accusations and Defense


The victim alleged that the accused repeatedly sexually assaulted her after inviting her to his house to play the board game Ludo. She filed a complaint after discovering her pregnancy. The accused claimed false implication for financial motives and argued that their relationship was consensual.

Court’s Observations


The court found inconsistencies in the victim’s statements. It noted that she continued visiting the accused’s house over an extended period and admitted to developing affectionate feelings for him. The delay in filing the complaint, without a reasonable explanation, further weakened the case.

Lack of Medical Evidence and Delay in Complaint


The court highlighted that there was no medical evidence indicating force or resistance. The victim did not report any incident until after she learned about her pregnancy. This suggested that the FIR was not a spontaneous complaint but a reaction to social pressure.

Verdict and Legal Standpoint


The court ruled that a consensual relationship could not be retrospectively reframed as rape due to societal pressure. It dismissed the allegations, emphasizing that the prosecution failed to prove non-consent beyond reasonable doubt. The accused was discharged, and the conviction overturned.

What Is IPC Section 376?

IPC Section 376 punishes rape offenses. It defines rape, prescribes imprisonment from 10 years to life, and includes strict penalties for aggravated cases.

You Might Also Like

IPC Section 202: Omission to Inform Offence – Indian Penal Code

Supreme Court Questions Excessive Reservation Under ‘Institutional Preference’ Quota In AIIMS PG Admissions

Mosque Falls Under ‘Waqf’, Disputes to Be Heard by Waqf Tribunal: Rajasthan HC

IPC Section 152: Assaulting or Obstructing Public Servant During Riot Suppression

Calcutta High Court Lifts Previous Ban On West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee

TAGGED:ConsentDelhi High CourtIPC 376DRaperape accusedRelationship
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Section 30 - Hindu Succession Act - Testamentary Succession Section 30 – Hindu Succession Act (HSA) – Testamentary Succession
Next Article How To Apply For A Senior Citizen Pension Eviction Only If Senior Citizen Owns Property Occupied By Their Children: Punjab And Haryana HC
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
How To Obtain A Copy Of A Court Order Or Judgement?
High CourtJammu & Kashmir High CourtNews

Trial Court Cannot Review Its Final Orders: Jammu and Kashmir HC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
3 months ago
DMRC Win: Supreme Court sets aside arbitral award in Favor of Anil Ambani firm in Delhi Airport Metro Case
Supreme Court Directs Uttar Pradesh To Ensure Full Education Sponsorship For Muzaffarnagar Slapping Victim
How To File A Case Under The The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002?
Tax Dept Cannot Indefinitely Attach Properties Without Action For Resolvement: Delhi HC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?