By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Ask a Lawyer
  • Find a Lawyer
  • Our Services
  • Legal News
  • Knowledge Hub
    • Bare Acts
      • BNS
      • BNSS
      • BSA
      • CrPC
      • CPC
      • DPDP
      • Hindu Marriage Act
      • Hindu Succession Act
      • The Hindu Adoptions And Maintenance Act
      • The Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act
      • IPC
      • Juvenile Justice Act
      • POCSO
      • Special Marriage Act
      • The Specific Relief Act
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
    • Legal Articles
    • Students Section – Judiciary, UPSC
    • Job Updates
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
  • About Us
Reading: Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, Penalizes Publication of Sexually Explicit Material in Electronic Form
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Ask a Lawyer
  • Find a Lawyer
  • Our Services
  • Legal News
  • Knowledge Hub
  • About Us
  • Home
  • Ask a Lawyer
  • Find a Lawyer
  • Our Services
  • Legal News
  • Knowledge Hub
    • Bare Acts
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
    • Legal Articles
    • Students Section – Judiciary, UPSC
    • Job Updates
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
  • About Us
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Allahabad High Court > Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, Penalizes Publication of Sexually Explicit Material in Electronic Form
Allahabad High CourtCyber CrimeNews

Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, Penalizes Publication of Sexually Explicit Material in Electronic Form

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: July 9, 2025 1:42 am
Amna Kabeer
1 month ago
Share
Information Technology Act Of 2000: Key Provisions, Responsibilities, And Amendments
Information Technology Act Of 2000: Key Provisions, Responsibilities, And Amendments
SHARE

The Allahabad High Court has denied bail to a man accused of sharing a woman’s indecent images via WhatsApp. The accused faces charges under Sections 74, 352, 351(2), 64(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 67A of the IT Act, 2000. Arrested in January 2025, he approached the High Court after the trial court rejected his bail plea in April. Justice Ajay Bhanot observed that digital technology is changing crime patterns and highlighted that sharing such content can ruin lives. The court noted that some images were recovered from the accused and are awaiting forensic examination, indicating his likely involvement. Emphasizing the dangers of cybercrime, the court refused bail but stressed the need for a speedy trial. It directed the trial court to conclude the case within a year. The District Judge must submit weekly progress reports, and the FSL report must be submitted within two months.

In earlier rulings, the bench criticized the poor quality of UP Police investigations in cybercrime cases and warned against the rising trend of circulating indecent content online, calling it a serious threat to society.

You Might Also Like

Calcutta High Court To Hear Plea Against BJP’s 12-Hour Strike Over Police Action At Nabanna Protest

Silence of Minor Victim During Cross Examination Not Grounds for Acquittal Of Accused: SC

Supreme Court Seeks AG’s Assistance In Petition Against West Bengal Governor’s Immunity In Molestation Case

Bombay High Court Disqualifies Husband Convicted Of Dowry Death From Inheriting Wife’s Property

What Is The Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025?

TAGGED:Allahabad High CourtInformation Technology ActInformation Technology Act 2000IT ActSection 67ASharing Explicit Content
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Delhi High Court Central OBC Certificate Not Valid for Delhi Govt Jobs: Delhi HC
Next Article Supreme Court Grants Bail to Humayun Merchant In Money Laundering Case Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Cannot Be Invoked Unless Clear Evidence Of Miscarriage Of Justice: J&K HC
1 Comment
  • Pingback: Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Cannot Be Invoked Unless Clear Evidence Of Miscarriage Of Justice: J&K HC - ApniLaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court Recognizes Right to Freedom from Adverse Effects of Climate Change in Landmark Decision
NewsSupreme Court

Supreme Court Recognizes Right to Freedom from Adverse Effects of Climate Change in Landmark Decision

Apni Law
By Apni Law
1 year ago
Chief Justice Highlights Judicial Process Issues At Special Lok Adalat Event
NDPS Act Search & Seizure Provisions in Landmark Judgment
Wife Can Claim Maintenance Even If She Has a Temporary Job: Kerala HC
Past Irregular Promotions Cannot Justify Future Violations: Supreme Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.
login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?