By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Conviction Under Section 498A Not Limited to Dowry Harassment But Also Cruelty: Madras HC
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Madras High Court > Conviction Under Section 498A Not Limited to Dowry Harassment But Also Cruelty: Madras HC
Madras High CourtNewsWomen Rights

Conviction Under Section 498A Not Limited to Dowry Harassment But Also Cruelty: Madras HC

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: April 27, 2025 9:04 am
Amna Kabeer
3 months ago
Share
Madras High Court
Madras High Court
SHARE


Wider Scope of Section 498A Recognized


The Madras High Court upheld the conviction of a husband and his mother under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The court clarified that the section is not limited to dowry harassment but includes all forms of cruelty inflicted on a wife by her husband or his relatives.

Contents
Wider Scope of Section 498A RecognizedCase BackgroundPetitioners’ DefenseCourt’s RulingFinal VerdictConclusion


Case Background


The All Women Police Station registered a case after the wife filed a complaint stating that her husband and mother-in-law forced her to consume abortion pills and later denied her entry into the matrimonial home. After investigating, the police filed charges under Sections 498A and 506(ii) of the IPC. The trial court acquitted them under Section 506(ii) but convicted them under Section 498A. The court sentenced both to one year of simple imprisonment and imposed a fine of Rs. 1,000 each.


Petitioners’ Defense


The husband and mother-in-law challenged the conviction. They argued there was no dowry demand or harassment. The duo claimed the case was based only on the wife’s and her parents’ statements. They alleged that a trivial matrimonial dispute was wrongly criminalized.


Court’s Ruling


Justice Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup rejected their defense. The court emphasized that cruelty under Section 498A includes more than dowry-related abuse. It accepted the wife’s testimony and noted that the accused had failed to present any witnesses or strong defense.


Final Verdict


The High Court confirmed the trial court’s ruling and upheld the conviction. It directed the Judicial Magistrate to issue a warrant to enforce the sentence. The Inspector of Police was instructed to execute the warrant and produce the accused before the court to serve their term.


Conclusion


This judgment reaffirms that Section 498A IPC covers a wide range of abuses beyond dowry harassment. It protects women from all forms of cruelty within marriage, strengthening the legal safeguard against domestic abuse.

You Might Also Like

Supreme Court Receives Appeal Against Allahabad High Court’s Ruling Invalidating Uttar Pradesh Madarsa Act

Delhi High Court Transfers Investigation Of Faizan’s Death To CBI

Supreme Court Issues Notice On Petition Against Cancellation Of NEET-SS 2024

Dowry Demand Not Necessary To Prove Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Challenging FIRs Against Gangster Lawrence Bishnoi Over Prison Interview

TAGGED:domestic violenceDowryDowry harassmentIPC 498Matrimonial Disputesmental crueltyphysical assualt
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Online Fraud - Digital Cyber Crime Online Fraud Alert: How Section 66D Of The IT Act Protects You From Online Scammers
Next Article Section 29 - The Special Marriage Act (SMA) - Restriction On Petitions For Divorce During First One Year After Marriage Section 29 – The Special Marriage Act (SMA) – Restriction On Petitions For Divorce During First One Year After Marriage.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court of India
NewsSupreme Court

Lapses Weakened The Prosecution’s Case: Supreme Court Acquits Death Row Convict

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Supreme Court Emphasises Need For Verification Mechanism For Tree-Felling Orders
Special Pension Benefits Apply Only When Death Occurs In Direct Connection With Official Duties: Delhi High Court
Supreme Court Directs Petitioner To Karnataka High Court For Landslide Rescue Operations
Married Sister Not Entitled to ‘Loss of Dependency’ Compensation in Motor Accident Case: Kerala High Court Rules
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Section 121 – Code of Civil Procedure – Effect Of Rules In First Schedule.

Section 120 – Code of Civil Procedure – Provisions Not Applicable To High Court In Original Civil Jurisdiction.

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?