By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Cheque Will Be Invalid Due To Single Signature On Joint Account: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Punjab & Haryana High Court > Cheque Will Be Invalid Due To Single Signature On Joint Account: Punjab & Haryana High Court
High CourtNewsPunjab & Haryana High Court

Cheque Will Be Invalid Due To Single Signature On Joint Account: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: January 28, 2025 11:04 pm
Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Share
Supreme Court Emphasises Settlement Over Punishment In Cheque Bounce Cases
Supreme Court Emphasises Settlement Over Punishment In Cheque Bounce Cases
SHARE

The Punjab & Haryana High Court quashed a cheque bounce complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (NI Act). Justice Harpreet Singh Brar ruled that the cheque, drawn on a joint account, was invalid since it was signed by only one of the account holders.

Contents
Key Case DetailsCase BackgroundCourt’s FindingsConclusion


Key Case Details


The cheque in question was issued from an account jointly held by the petitioner and his wife. However, it was signed solely by Jasbir Kaur, the petitioner’s wife, and not by the petitioner himself.
The court referred to the Supreme Court judgment in Mrs. Aparna A. Shah vs. M/s Sheth Developers Pvt. Ltd. (2013). It stated that all joint account holders must sign a cheque for it to be valid. A joint account holder cannot be prosecuted under Section 138 unless they have signed the cheque.


Case Background


In May 2018, the petitioner borrowed ₹7,50,000 from the respondent as a friendly loan to expand his business. He promised repayment by April 2019 but delayed repeatedly. Finally, the petitioner issued a cheque dated 12.06.2019 for ₹7,50,000.
When presented for encashment, the cheque was returned on 13.06.2019 with the remark “funds insufficient.” The respondent sent a legal notice dated 05.07.2019, but it was mistakenly addressed to a different person, Rishi Jain. Later, a corrigendum notice dated 24.07.2019 was issued to the petitioner.


Court’s Findings


The court noted that a valid legal notice is essential under Section 138 NI Act. It gives the accused an opportunity to settle the debt before facing criminal proceedings. Justice Brar observed that the notice sent to the wrong person created “incurable illegality” in the case.
The corrigendum notice issued on 24.07.2019 was also found invalid as it was served after the statutory 30-day period. The court ruled that the procedural defects vitiated the proceedings, making them legally unsustainable.


Conclusion


In light of the defects in the notice and the absence of joint signatures on the cheque, the Punjab & Haryana High Court quashed the cheque bounce complaint and summoning order.

You Might Also Like

Supreme Court Enforces Stricter Conditions for Tree Felling In Public Projects, Cites Right To Healthy Environment

Complainant Cannot Demand Hearing in Bail Cases Under Juvenile Justice Act: Delhi HC

Contraband Recovery from Accused Must Be Considered Individually for Bail: J&K High Court

Must Cooperate With The Investigation: Supreme Court Grants Interim Protection To YouTuber Ranveer Allahabadia In Obscenity Case

Marriage No Defence Under POCSO Act: Madras HC

TAGGED:Bank AccountsCheque BounceHigh CourtInvalidationPunjab and Haryana High court
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article High Court of Madras Ex-Servicemen Can Claim Concession If Not Recruited At Application Date: Madras High Court
Next Article Supreme Court Notifies Plea Challenging Kerala HC's Ruling on Muslim Woman's Right to Divorce via 'Khula' Non-Bailable Warrants Barred In Maintenance Cases Under Section 125 CrPC: Kerala High Court
1 Comment
  • Pingback: Understanding The Mechanics Of Cheques - ApniLaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court Tasks CAG to Probe Corruption Allegations Against Arunachal Pradesh Government from 2007-11
NewsSupreme Court

Supreme Court Tasks CAG to Probe Corruption Allegations Against Arunachal Pradesh Government from 2007-11

Apni Law
By Apni Law
1 year ago
Common Object’ Required Among Mob For Charge Under Section 302 IPC: Telangana High Court
Rape on False Promise of Marriage’ Does Not Apply to Married Women: Kerala High Court
Civil Court Decree Necessary for Name Change in Board Certificates: Allahabad High Court
Supreme Court Overturns Acquittal In Cheque Bounce Case, Orders Rs. 28.5 Lakh Fine
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?