If a company insists on appointing the sole arbitrator at their own location, leaving the other party with no say, what good is an arbitration agreement? Does this situation truly offer a fair chance for justice?

Under Indian law, an arbitration agreement should be fair and reasonable. A company unilaterally dictating the location of the arbitration undermines fairness and the principle of party autonomy. This can create an imbalance and potentially disadvantage the other party, raising questions about the agreement’s validity.