By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Cash In Bank Account Is ‘Property’ Liable For Attachment: Kerala High Court
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Kerala High Court > Cash In Bank Account Is ‘Property’ Liable For Attachment: Kerala High Court
High CourtKerala High CourtNews

Cash In Bank Account Is ‘Property’ Liable For Attachment: Kerala High Court

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: February 1, 2025 10:04 pm
Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Share
High Court of Kerala
High Court of Kerala
SHARE

Cash In Bank Account Is ‘Property’ Liable For Attachment

The Kerala High Court ruled that cash in a bank account qualifies as “property” and can be provisionally attached under Section 281B of the Income Tax Act. A Division Bench comprising Justices Sathish Ninan and Shoba Annamma Eapen clarified that the absence of an explicit mention of bank accounts in Section 281B does not exempt them from attachment.

Contents
Cash In Bank Account Is ‘Property’ Liable For AttachmentCourt Observations and RationaleCourt’s Decision


Court Observations and Rationale


Section 281B allows the Assessing Officer to provisionally attach property to prevent possible tax defaults. In this case, the police seized a large amount of unaccounted cash from the assessee’s car. The authorities initiated proceedings under Section 148 after the assessee failed to explain the source of the cash.
The Income Tax Department expected a tax liability, including penalties, exceeding ₹2 crores. Fearing evasion, they attached the assessee’s bank accounts under Section 281B. While a writ petition initially overturned the attachment, the department challenged the decision before the High Court.
The court emphasized that the provisional attachment must match the probable tax demand and penalty and not exceed it.


Court’s Decision


The court ruled in favor of the department, allowing the attachment of bank accounts. However, it stressed that attachment orders must align with the probable demand, ensuring they are not excessive.

You Might Also Like

Abuse Without Suicide Attempt Still Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC: J&K High Court

Mediation Is Only Permissible When Both Parties Agree To It: SC

Supreme Court, Specific Relief Act, Contract Law, Legal News, Execution Proceedings, Justice JB Pardiwala, Justice Manoj Misra

If Medical Experts Determine Hospitalization Is Necessary, Insurers Must Honor Claim: J&K High Court

How To File A Case Under The Transfer Of Property Act?

TAGGED:Bank AccountsCustody of PropertyHigh CourtsKerala High CourtMoneyProperty
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Bail Conditions Cannot Mandate Maintenance Payment In Marital Disputes: Supreme Court Detention Order Doesn’t Prevent Bail Consideration: Madras HC
Next Article High Court of Madras Ex-Servicemen Can Claim Concession If Not Recruited At Application Date: Madras High Court
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Bail is Rule, Jail is Exception: Supreme Court Upholds In UAPA Case
CriminalHigh CourtJammu & Kashmir High CourtNews

Arresting Accused Under New Charge After Granting Bail In Same FIR Violates Fundamental Rights: Jammu and Kashmir High Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
3 months ago
Supreme Court Grants Bail To Ashutosh Garg In ₹1,032 Crore GST Fraud Case
Bail is Rule, Jail is Exception: Supreme Court Upholds In UAPA Case
Trial Court Cannot Review Its Final Orders: Jammu and Kashmir HC
Pressing Lips of a Minor May Outrage Modesty But Doesn’t Necessarily Constitute Aggravated Sexual Assault: Delhi HC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Official Secrets Act

Can the Official Secrets Act Override the Right to Information (RTI)?

Official Secrets Act

Who Can Be Prosecuted Under the Official Secrets Act?

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?