By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 404 CrPC: Metropolitan Magistrate’s Decision Grounds for High Court Review
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > CrPC > Section 404 CrPC: Metropolitan Magistrate’s Decision Grounds for High Court Review
CrPC

Section 404 CrPC: Metropolitan Magistrate’s Decision Grounds for High Court Review

Apni Law
Last updated: June 1, 2024 8:42 pm
Apni Law
1 year ago
Share
SHARE

Section 404 CrPC: Metropolitan Magistrate’s Decision Grounds for High Court Review

Contents
1. State the Code2. Explain it3. Illustrate it4. Common Questions and Answers

1. State the Code

Section 404 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) deals with the power of the High Court to review the decisions of Metropolitan Magistrates.

2. Explain it

This section outlines the circumstances under which a Metropolitan Magistrate’s decision can be reviewed by the High Court. The High Court can review such decisions if they are:

  • Erroneous: This implies a mistake in the application of law or facts.
  • Illegal: This refers to a decision that violates the provisions of the CrPC or any other law.
  • Against the principles of natural justice: This includes situations where the Magistrate has acted unfairly or without giving the accused a fair chance to present their case.
  • Against the weight of evidence: This means the decision is not supported by the evidence presented during the trial.

3. Illustrate it

Here’s an example of how Section 404 CrPC might be applied:

A Metropolitan Magistrate convicts a person of theft based on weak evidence. The accused challenges this decision in the High Court, arguing that the Magistrate’s decision was against the weight of evidence. If the High Court finds merit in this argument, it may use Section 404 to review the Metropolitan Magistrate’s decision and potentially overturn the conviction.

4. Common Questions and Answers

Q: Who can file a petition for review under Section 404?

A: Typically, the accused person can file a petition for review. However, other parties involved in the case, like the prosecution, may also file a petition in specific circumstances.

Q: What is the time limit for filing a petition for review?

A: There’s no specific time limit mentioned in Section 404. However, the High Court may prescribe a reasonable time limit based on the circumstances of the case.

Q: What is the procedure for filing a petition for review?

A: A petition for review needs to be filed with the High Court. It must contain specific details about the decision of the Metropolitan Magistrate and the reasons for seeking review.

Q: What powers does the High Court have in reviewing a Metropolitan Magistrate’s decision?

A: The High Court can confirm, modify, or set aside the Metropolitan Magistrate’s decision. It can also order a retrial if necessary.

You Might Also Like

Section 380 CrPC: Special Right of Appeal in Certain Cases – Code of Criminal Procedure

CrPC Section 263: Record in Summary Trials – Code of Criminal Procedure

Supreme Court Set to Hear Arvind Kejriwal’s Challenge Against ED Arrest on April 15

Section 125 Of The Code Of Criminal Procedure

Section 198A CrPC: Prosecution of Offences Under Section 498A IPC

TAGGED:Criminal ProcedureCrPCDecision GroundsHigh CourtIndian LawJudicial Reviewlegal proceedingsMetropolitan MagistrateSection 404
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article CrPC Section 40: Duty of Village Officers to Report – Explained
Next Article Section 41 CrPC: Arrest Without Warrant – Code of Criminal Procedure
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court Extends Tenure Of Justice Gita Mittal Committee By Six Months
News

Supreme Court Extends Tenure Of Justice Gita Mittal Committee By Six Months

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
11 months ago
Supreme Court Upholds NEET-UG Exam Despite Paper Leak Allegations
Supreme Court Ruling: Vendor Cannot Re-Sell Property Pending Registration
Supreme Court Issues Notice On Establishing Adequate Forensic Science Labs
Marriages Abroad Involving One Indian Citizen Must Be Registered Under the Foreign Marriage Act: Kerala High Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Work Related Injury to Employee

Denying Regularization To Temporary Workers After 8 Years of Service Is Unfair, Says HP High Court

High Court of Jammu & Kashmir

Alibi Defence Can’t Justify Quashing Charge Sheet Before Trial, Says J&K High Court

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?