By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: CrPC Section 359: Order to Pay Costs in Non-Cognizable Cases
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > CrPC > CrPC Section 359: Order to Pay Costs in Non-Cognizable Cases
CrPC

CrPC Section 359: Order to Pay Costs in Non-Cognizable Cases

Apni Law
Last updated: May 31, 2024 10:18 pm
Apni Law
1 year ago
Share
SHARE

CrPC Section 359: Order to Pay Costs in Non-Cognizable Cases

1. State the Code:

Section 359 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) deals with the power of a Magistrate to order payment of costs in non-cognizable cases.

2. Explanation:

This section empowers a Magistrate to order a complainant to pay costs to the accused in a non-cognizable case, if the Magistrate finds the case to be frivolous or vexatious. A non-cognizable case is an offense that the police cannot arrest a person for without a warrant.

The Magistrate can order the payment of costs to compensate the accused for the expenses incurred by them in defending the case.

3. Illustration:

Imagine a scenario where someone files a complaint against their neighbor alleging theft, which is a non-cognizable offense. If the Magistrate finds the complaint to be baseless and without merit, they can order the complainant to pay costs to the accused for the legal expenses they incurred.

4. Common Questions and Answers:

Q: What is considered frivolous or vexatious?

A: A case is considered frivolous or vexatious if it lacks any reasonable basis and is intended to harass or annoy the accused.

Q: Who decides whether a case is frivolous or vexatious?

A: The Magistrate hearing the case has the discretion to determine if the case is frivolous or vexatious.

Q: What are the factors considered by the Magistrate?

A: The Magistrate considers factors such as the evidence presented, the conduct of the complainant, and the nature of the allegations.

Q: Can the Magistrate order costs even if the accused is acquitted?

A: Yes, the Magistrate can still order costs even if the accused is acquitted, if they find the case was frivolous or vexatious.

Q: How much can the Magistrate order as costs?

A: The amount of costs ordered is at the discretion of the Magistrate and is determined based on the expenses incurred by the accused.

You Might Also Like

Section 398 CrPC: Power to Order Inquiry – Code of Criminal Procedure

CrPC Section 290: Execution of Foreign Commissions – Complete Guide

Legal Analysis: Arresting Women at Night – Rights & Exceptions

Supreme Court: Compensation Can Exceed Claimed Amount If Just And Reasonable

Section 302 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Power To Require Attendance Of Prisoners.

TAGGED:CompensationCostsCriminal LawCriminal Procedure CodeCrPCIndian LawLegal CostsNon-Cognizable OffensesOrderPaymentProcedureSection 359
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Section 357A CrPC: Victim Compensation Scheme in India – Code of Criminal Procedure
Next Article CrPC Section 365: Court of Session’s Duty to Send Findings and Sentence to District Magistrate
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court Emphasises Need For Verification Mechanism For Tree-Felling Orders
News

Supreme Court Emphasises Need For Verification Mechanism For Tree-Felling Orders

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
11 months ago
No Refund of Court Fees for Private Settlements: Rules Supreme Court
Challenge A Threat To Secularism: Congress Defends Places Of Worship Act In Supreme Court
Mental Disorders Like Schizophrenia Not Enough for Divorce, Living Conditions Must Be Severe: Patna High Court
Alimony and Maintenance Can Be Granted Even If Marriage Is Declared Void: SC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?