Code:
(1) If, at the time of delivery of any judgment or final order disposing of any judicial proceeding, a Court of Session or Magistrate of the first class expresses an opinion to the effect that any witness appearing in such proceeding had knowingly or wilfully given false evidence or had fabricated false evidence with the intention that such evidence should be used in such proceeding, it or he may, if satisfied that it is necessary and expedient in the interest of justice that the witness should be tried summarily for giving or fabricating, as the case may be, false evidence, take cognizance of the offence and may, after giving the offender a reasonable opportunity of showing cause why he should not be punished for such offence, try such offender summarily and sentence him to imprisonment for a term which may extend to three months, or to fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both.
(2) In every such case the Court shall follow, as nearly as may be practicable, the procedure prescribed for summary trials.
(3) Nothing in this section shall affect the power of the Court to make a complaint under section 340 for the offence, where it does not choose to proceed under this section.
(4) Where, after any action is initiated under sub-section (1), it is made to appear to the Court of Session or Magistrate of the first class that an appeal or an application for revision has been preferred or filed against the judgment or order in which the opinion referred to in that sub-section has been expressed, it or he shall stay further proceedings of the trial until the disposal of the appeal or the application for revision, as the case may be, and thereupon the further proceedings of the trial shall abide by the results of the appeal or application for revision.
Explanation:
This section empowers a Magistrate to conduct a summary trial for the offence of giving false evidence under Section 193 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
The trial can be conducted summarily if the Magistrate is satisfied that the accused has given false evidence in a judicial proceeding.
Illustration:
Imagine a witness named Raj is giving evidence in a theft case. Raj testifies that he saw the accused stealing the item. Later, it is proven that Raj was not at the scene of the crime and was lying. In this case, the Magistrate can initiate a summary trial against Raj under Section 344 for giving false evidence.
Common Questions and Answers:
Q: What is the punishment for giving false evidence?
A: The punishment for giving false evidence under Section 193 IPC is imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Q: Can a summary trial be conducted for all cases of false evidence?
A: No, Section 344 specifies that the summary trial can only be conducted for the offence of giving false evidence under Section 193 IPC.
Q: What are the advantages of a summary trial?
A: Summary trials are generally faster and less formal than regular trials.
Q: Can the accused appeal against the verdict in a summary trial?
A: Yes, the accused has the right to appeal against the verdict in a summary trial.