By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 57 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Primary Evidence.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > BSA > Section 57 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Primary Evidence.
BSA

Section 57 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Primary Evidence.

Apni Law
Last updated: April 25, 2025 11:09 pm
Apni Law
6 months ago
Share
Section 57 - Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) - Primary Evidence
Section 57 - Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) - Primary Evidence
SHARE

Code: Section 57 BSA

Primary evidence means the document itself produced for the inspection of the
Court.
Explanation 1.—Where a document is executed in several parts, each part is primary
evidence of the document.
Explanation 2.—Where a document is executed in counterpart, each counterpart
being executed by one or some of the parties only, each counterpart is primary evidence as
against the parties executing it.
Explanation 3.—Where a number of documents are all made by one uniform process,
as in the case of printing, lithography or photography, each is primary evidence of the
contents of the rest; but, where they are all copies of a common original, they are not
primary evidence of the contents of the original.

Contents
Code: Section 57 BSAExplanation of Section 57 BSAIllustrationCommon Questions and Answers on Section 57 BSAConclusion

Explanation 4.—Where an electronic or digital record is created or stored, and such
storage occurs simultaneously or sequentially in multiple files, each such file is primary
evidence.
Explanation 5.—Where an electronic or digital record is produced from proper
custody, such electronic and digital record is primary evidence unless it is disputed.
Explanation 6.—Where a video recording is simultaneously stored in electronic
form and transmitted or broadcast or transferred to another, each of the stored recordings is
primary evidence.
Explanation 7.—Where an electronic or digital record is stored in multiple storage
spaces in a computer resource, each such automated storage, including temporary files, is
primary evidence.
Illustration.
A person is shown to have been in possession of a number of placards, all printed at
one time from one original. Any one of the placards is primary evidence of the contents of
any other, but no one of them is primary evidence of the contents of the original.

—

Explanation of Section 57 BSA

Section 57 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam defines what constitutes “primary evidence.” It establishes that the original document itself, when produced before the court, is considered primary evidence. The section further elaborates various situations—both physical and digital—where a document or record qualifies as primary evidence.

This section is essential because the Indian Evidence Act places a higher evidentiary value on primary evidence compared to secondary evidence. Whenever possible, courts expect the original document or equivalent electronic records to be produced to prove the contents of a document.

Key Points:

  • The original document presented to the court is primary evidence.

  • Multiple parts of a document or signed counterparts are treated as primary evidence.

  • Documents created via the same process (like printing or photography) can each serve as primary evidence of each other.

  • For electronic and digital records, various forms of stored data and transmitted files can qualify as primary evidence, especially when produced from proper custody.

—

Illustration

Example 1: Physical Document in Multiple Parts

If a property sale agreement is signed in two parts—one kept by the buyer and one by the seller—each part is primary evidence of the agreement.

Example 2: Digitally Stored Files

A CCTV video is recorded and saved simultaneously to multiple drives. Each of these files qualifies as primary evidence, provided they are from proper custody and not disputed.

Example 3: Uniform Process Documents

A batch of flyers printed using the same printing plate can be used interchangeably as primary evidence of their content. However, they cannot serve as primary evidence of the original printing plate design.

—

Common Questions and Answers on Section 57 BSA

  1. What is considered primary evidence under Section 57?

Primary evidence is the original document presented to the court. It is the best form of proof of a document’s contents.

  1. Are digital files considered primary evidence?

Yes, Section 57 includes several explanations to affirm that digital and electronic files—whether simultaneously or sequentially stored—can be considered primary evidence.

  1. What if a document is executed in counterparts?

Each counterpart is primary evidence against the party that signed it.

  1. Can printed copies be primary evidence?

Yes, if a document is created through a uniform process (like lithography), each copy is considered primary evidence of the others—but not of the original design.

  1. What happens if the primary evidence is unavailable?

If the original document is lost or cannot be produced, parties may rely on secondary evidence as per Section 58 and other related provisions.

—

Conclusion

Section 57 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam broadens the understanding of primary evidence to include both traditional documents and modern digital formats. By explicitly recognizing electronic records, simultaneous storage, and uniform processes, the law aligns with technological advancements in the handling and presentation of evidence. This section ensures that courts have access to the most authentic and reliable version of any document or record.

For more detailed legal resources and updates on Indian evidence law, visit ApniLaw.

You Might Also Like

Section 68 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Proof Where No Attesting Witness Found.

Section 100 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – . Evidence As To Application Of Language To One Of Two Sets Of Facts, To Neither Of Which The Whole Correctly Applies.

Section 45 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Grounds Of Opinion, When Relevant.

Section 120 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Presumption As To Absence Of Consent In Certain Prosecution For Rape.

Section 107 – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Burden Of Proving Fact To Be Proved To Make Evidence Admissible.

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Madras High Court Questions Central Government’s Repeal Of Criminal Laws, Citing Potential Confusion And Delays Cannot Misuse Press Freedom To Defame A Person Without Verifying Facts: Madras HC
Next Article High Court of Bombay Offence Under Section 498-A IPC Begins From The Last Act Of Cruelty: Bombay High Court
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court of India
Allahabad High CourtNewsPOCSO & Sexual CrimesSupreme Court

Grabbing Breasts Of Minor And Dragging Not Attempt To Rape: SC Takes Cognizance of HC Order

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Dismissal Revokes Pension Rights Under Rule 2.5 of the Punjab Civil Services Rules: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Supreme Court Upholds Renaming Of Aurangabad And Osmanabad
Bail Conditions Cannot Mandate Maintenance Payment In Marital Disputes: Supreme Court
Police Have Authority To Take Action Against Women with False Accusation: Kerala High Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Difference Between Civil Recovery and Criminal Action in Cheque Bounce Cases Under Negotiable Instruments Act

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Landmark Supreme Court Judgements In Cheque Bounce Cases (Case Overview)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?