By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Section 347 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Counterfeiting A Property Mark.
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Bare Act > BNS > Section 347 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Counterfeiting A Property Mark.
BNS

Section 347 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Counterfeiting A Property Mark.

Apni Law
Last updated: April 7, 2025 8:25 am
Apni Law
3 months ago
Share
Section 347 - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) - Counterfeiting A Property Mark
Section 347 - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) - Counterfeiting A Property Mark
SHARE

Code: Section 347 BNS

Offense Related to Counterfeiting Property Marks

(1) Whoever counterfeits any property mark used by any other person shall be
punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years,
or with fine, or with both.
(2) Whoever counterfeits any property mark used by a public servant, or any mark
used by a public servant to denote that any property has been manufactured by a particular
person or at a particular time or place, or that the property is of a particular quality or has
passed through a particular office, or that it is entitled to any exemption, or uses as genuine
any such mark knowing the same to be counterfeit, shall be punished with imprisonment of
either description for a term which may extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine.


Explanation of Section 347 BNS

Section 347 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) deals with the serious offense of counterfeiting property marks. A property mark is an identifier used to denote the ownership, origin, quality, or other specific characteristics of movable property. Counterfeiting such marks can lead to fraud, misrepresentation, and financial loss.

Contents
Code: Section 347 BNSOffense Related to Counterfeiting Property MarksExplanation of Section 347 BNSIllustrationExample 1: Counterfeiting a Brand LogoExample 2: Forging an Official Quality MarkCommon Questions and Answers on Section 347 BNS1. What is considered counterfeiting under Section 347?2. What is the punishment for counterfeiting a private property mark?3. Why is counterfeiting a public servant’s mark punished more severely?4. Can someone be punished if they didn’t intend to defraud?Conclusion

This section distinguishes between two types of counterfeiting:

  1. Counterfeiting a Property Mark Used by Any Person (Subsection 1):
    • Applies to general cases where someone reproduces or imitates another person’s property mark without permission.
    • Punishment: Up to 2 years of imprisonment, a fine, or both.
  2. Counterfeiting a Property Mark Used by a Public Servant (Subsection 2):
    • Covers marks used by public servants to indicate official details, such as manufacturing origin, quality certification, exemptions, etc.
    • Punishment: Up to 3 years of imprisonment, plus a fine.

Illustration

Example 1: Counterfeiting a Brand Logo

A person creates fake handbags and uses the logo of a popular luxury brand without permission. This act constitutes counterfeiting under Section 347(1) because the mark belongs to another person.

Example 2: Forging an Official Quality Mark

A manufacturer falsifies the “ISO Certified” mark on substandard products to mislead customers. Since the mark is associated with a public standard, this would fall under Section 347(2), attracting a harsher penalty.


Common Questions and Answers on Section 347 BNS

1. What is considered counterfeiting under Section 347?

  • Answer: Counterfeiting involves making or using a fake property mark that imitates an official or legitimate mark to deceive others.

2. What is the punishment for counterfeiting a private property mark?

  • Answer: Imprisonment up to 2 years, a fine, or both.

3. Why is counterfeiting a public servant’s mark punished more severely?

  • Answer: Because it undermines public trust in official certifications, potentially endangering public safety, health, or financial integrity.

4. Can someone be punished if they didn’t intend to defraud?

  • Answer: Yes, the section focuses on the act of counterfeiting itself, not just the intent. However, the severity of the penalty may vary depending on the circumstances.

Conclusion

Section 347 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) plays a crucial role in preventing fraud and maintaining the integrity of property marks. By criminalizing the act of counterfeiting—especially when it involves public servants’ marks—the law ensures that businesses, consumers, and the public are protected from deceptive practices.


You Might Also Like

Section 179 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Using As Genuine, Forged Or Counterfeit Coin, Government Stamp, Currency-Notes Or Bank-Notes.

Section 159 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Abetting Mutiny, Or Attempting To Seduce A Soldier, Sailor Or Airman From His Duty.

Section 161 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Abetment Of Assault By Soldier, Sailor Or Airman On His Superior Officer, When In Execution Of His Office.

Section 205 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Wearing Garb Or Carrying Token Used By Public Servant With Fraudulent Intent.

Section 238 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Causing Disappearance Of Evidence Of Offence, Or Giving False Information To Screen Offender.

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Child Adoption Step-Parent Adoption Requires Biological Parent’s Consent: Kerala HC
Next Article POCSO Act Pressing Lips of a Minor May Outrage Modesty But Doesn’t Necessarily Constitute Aggravated Sexual Assault: Delhi HC
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Bail Conditions Cannot Mandate Maintenance Payment In Marital Disputes: Supreme Court
CriminalFamilyNewsSupreme Court

Bail Conditions Cannot Mandate Maintenance Payment In Marital Disputes: Supreme Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Police Have Authority To Take Action Against Women with False Accusation: Kerala High Court
Re-Testing Of Drugs in NDPS Cases Allowed Only in Rare Situations: Rajasthan HC
Supreme Court Considers Transferring CLAT-2025 Petitions To Punjab And Haryana High Court
Husband’s Father Not Automatically Liable For Widow’s Maintenance Under Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act: Patna HC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?