Introduction

Article 229 of the Indian Constitution explains who controls the officers and servants working in the High Courts. It answers an important constitutional question. Who manages the internal administration of High Courts? The Constitution gives this power mainly to the Chief Justice of the High Court. This Article exists to protect judicial independence. It ensures that the executive government cannot interfere in the day-to-day functioning of High Courts. At the same time, it maintains financial accountability through limited executive involvement.

Why was Article 229 included in the Constitution?

The framers of the Constitution understood one basic principle. Courts cannot function independently if their staff and administration are controlled by the government. Article 229 was included to prevent such control. It separates judicial administration from executive power. This strengthens the doctrine of separation of powers. The Article ensures that High Courts can operate smoothly, efficiently, and without political pressure.

Who appoints officers and servants of the High Court?

Article 229(1) clearly answers this question. The Chief Justice of the High Court holds the authority to appoint officers and servants of the Court. The Chief Justice may also delegate this power to another judge or officer of the Court. This arrangement allows flexibility and administrative efficiency. However, there is one limited exception. If a person is being appointed from outside the High Court establishment, the Governor may require consultation with the State Public Service Commission. Even this condition does not reduce the Chief Justice’s primary authority.

Who decides the service conditions of High Court staff?

Article 229(2) deals with service conditions. It places this responsibility entirely in the hands of the Chief Justice. The Chief Justice frames rules related to salaries, allowances, leave, pensions, and other service matters. These rules apply to all officers and servants of the High Court. This power ensures uniformity and fairness within the judicial system. However, when these rules involve financial matters, the approval of the Governor becomes necessary. This requirement ensures that public funds are spent lawfully and responsibly.

Does the Governor have control over High Court administration?

The Governor does not control the High Court administration. The Governor’s role remains very limited under Article 229. The Governor only approves financial rules and may require consultation with the State Public Service Commission in specific cases. The executive cannot override the Chief Justice’s decisions on appointments or service conditions. This limited role prevents executive overreach while preserving fiscal discipline.

How are High Court expenses funded under Article 229?

Article 229(3) provides financial security to High Courts. It states that all administrative expenses of the High Court are charged to the Consolidated Fund of the State. These expenses include salaries, allowances, pensions, and other costs related to officers and servants. Because these expenses are charged and not voted upon, the State Legislature cannot reduce or delay them. This ensures uninterrupted functioning of the judiciary. Court fees collected by High Courts are also credited to the same Consolidated Fund.

How does Article 229 support judicial independence?

Article 229 strengthens judicial independence in a practical way. Courts need more than constitutional words to remain independent. They need control over staff, administration, and finances. By placing these powers in the hands of the Chief Justice, Article 229 prevents political interference. It allows High Courts to function efficiently and fearlessly. Independence of the judiciary becomes real and effective through this provision.

What did the Supreme Court say in State of Assam v. S.N. Sen?

In State of Assam v. S.N. Sen, the Supreme Court strongly upheld Article 229. The Court ruled that the Chief Justice has primacy in matters relating to High Court staff. The executive government cannot interfere with appointments or service conditions. The judgment emphasized that judicial independence depends on administrative autonomy. Any dilution of the Chief Justice’s authority would violate the Constitution.

What was decided in High Court of Rajasthan v. Ramesh Chand Paliwal?

In this landmark 1998 case, the Supreme Court clarified another important issue. The Court held that State governments cannot regulate service conditions of High Court employees without proper legislation. Even administrative instructions from the government cannot override rules framed by the Chief Justice. This judgment reinforced the supremacy of Article 229 and protected the internal governance of High Courts.

What role did the All India Judges Association case play?

The All India Judges Association case highlighted the financial aspect of Article 229. The Supreme Court observed that charging High Court expenses to the Consolidated Fund ensures financial stability. Since these expenses are non-votable, legislatures cannot exert pressure by controlling funds. This decision further strengthened judicial independence across India.

How is Article 229 different from Article 146?

Article 229 applies to High Courts, while Article 146 applies to the Supreme Court. In both Articles, the Chief Justice controls appointments and service conditions. The difference lies in funding. High Court expenses come from the State Consolidated Fund. Supreme Court expenses come from the Union Consolidated Fund. Also, under Article 146, the President has no role similar to the Governor’s limited approval power under Article 229.

Why is Article 229 important for exams and students?

Article 229 is frequently asked in constitutional law, polity, and competitive exams. It connects judicial independence, separation of powers, and financial autonomy. Understanding this Article helps students grasp how the Constitution protects courts in real life. It is not just a theoretical provision. It plays a direct role in maintaining the balance between the judiciary and the executive.

For any specific query call at ‪+91 – 8569843472‬

Conclusion

Article 229 ensures that High Courts remain independent, efficient, and financially secure. It gives real power to the Chief Justice. It limits executive interference. It guarantees uninterrupted funding. Together, these features protect the rule of law. Article 229 stands as a strong constitutional shield for judicial administration in India.