By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Necessity Of Proper Mechanism Under Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954: SC Stresses Importance of Drugs and Magic Remedies Act
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Necessity Of Proper Mechanism Under Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954: SC Stresses Importance of Drugs and Magic Remedies Act
NewsSupreme Court

Necessity Of Proper Mechanism Under Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954: SC Stresses Importance of Drugs and Magic Remedies Act

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: February 25, 2025 5:42 pm
Amna Kabeer
3 months ago
Share
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
SHARE


The Supreme Court of India has emphasized the necessity of a proper mechanism under the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954 to enable citizens to file complaints against misleading medical advertisements. A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan directed Senior Advocate Shadan Farasat, acting as Amicus Curiae, to submit a note on the Act’s implementation before the next hearing on March 7.
The Court underlined that the Act requires a proper enforcement system, including grievance redressal mechanisms such as dedicated complaint helplines. Justice Oka stressed that strict prosecution must follow violations, as the Act holds vital public importance.

Contents
States’ Compliance with Previous OrdersNext Steps


States’ Compliance with Previous Orders


The hearing also reviewed the compliance of states and union territories (UTs) with past Supreme Court directives regarding misleading medical ads. Earlier, the Court had ordered states/UTs to submit affidavits detailing actions taken since 2018 under the Drugs and Magic Remedies Act, the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, and the Consumer Protection Act.


Jharkhand: The state claimed no manufacturer applied for Rule 170 permissions, but the Court demanded clarification on whether any misleading ads were being published in the state. A better affidavit was ordered.


Karnataka: The state failed to prosecute 25 cases due to lack of details such as license numbers. The Court dismissed these as excuses and directed authorities to use their police and cyber cells to identify offenders.


Kerala: The Court found no need for additional directions, as the state was effectively implementing Rule 170.


Punjab & Madhya Pradesh: Their affidavits were recently submitted, and the Court will review them at the next hearing.


Pondicherry: Initially issued a non-compliance notice, the UT was later granted more time after its counsel appeared in court.


Andhra Pradesh: The Chief Secretary was summoned for failing to file compliance reports. Despite requests for leniency, the Court refused, stating that the state showed no sense of responsibility in meeting deadlines.


Next Steps


Comprehensive directions are expected on March 7. The Supreme Court is set to ensure stricter enforcement of the Drugs and Magic Remedies Act. States and UTs will need to prove compliance or face serious legal consequences.

You Might Also Like

Supreme Court Notifies Plea Challenging Kerala HC’s Ruling on Muslim Woman’s Right to Divorce via ‘Khula’

The Enduring Influence Of Judicial Precedents On Indian Jurisprudence

SC or ST Act: Caste Abuse Must Occur In Public View To Be An Offense, Rules Supreme Court

Section 22 – Hindu Marriage Act – Proceedings To Be In Camera And May Not Be Printed Or Published.

No Extortion Case Against Wife for Seeking Maintenance: Karnataka High Court

TAGGED:Court DecisionHigh Court DecisionsMechanismSupreme Court
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Section 240 - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) - Giving False Information Respecting An Offence Committed Section 240 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Giving False Information Respecting An Offence Committed.
Next Article NDPS Act Co-accused Cannot be Convicted Based On Suspicion Or Assumption Without Proof: Telangana HC On NDPS Act
13 Comments
  • Pingback: Supreme Court Upholds Right To Challenge Orders Despite Compliance Under Threat - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: Calcutta High Court Rules Section 354A IPC Cannot Be Applied Against Women - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: Supreme Court Upholds Regularisation Of Daily Wage Worker By MP High Court - ApniLaw

Comments pagination

← Older Comments 1 … 302 303 304

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court of India
News

Supreme Court Upholds High Court’s Decision Allowing Defendant To File Written Statement After 17-Year Delay

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
10 months ago
Supreme Court Limits Sentencing For Attempted Murder To 10 Years If Life Imprisonment Is Not Imposed
Supreme Court Refuses Stay on Hindu Puja in Gyanvapi Mosque Cellar: Key Developments & Legal Implications
Secularism As Core of India’s Nationalism: Indian National Congress Appeals To Supreme Court
Supreme Court Extends Tenure Of Justice Gita Mittal Committee By Six Months
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?