By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Supreme Court Limits Sentencing For Attempted Murder To 10 Years If Life Imprisonment Is Not Imposed
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Supreme Court Limits Sentencing For Attempted Murder To 10 Years If Life Imprisonment Is Not Imposed
News

Supreme Court Limits Sentencing For Attempted Murder To 10 Years If Life Imprisonment Is Not Imposed

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: March 29, 2025 7:57 pm
Amna Kabeer
11 months ago
Share
Murder Attempt case
Murder Attempt case
SHARE

The Supreme Court has ruled that if a life sentence is not imposed for an offence of attempted murder under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the maximum sentence cannot exceed 10 years. The decision clarifies the sentencing limits for attempted murder convictions when life imprisonment is deemed unfit by the court.

The bench, consisted of Justices CT Ravikumar and Rajesh Bindal. They stated, “When the court concerned upon convicting the accused thought it fit not to impose imprisonment for life, the punishment to be handed down in any circumstance cannot exceed the punishment prescribed under the first part of Section 307 IPC.”

What Is IPC Section 307

Section 307 IPC defines the punishment for attempted murder. The first part allows for a maximum sentence of up to 10 years and a fine. The second part permits life imprisonment if the attempt causes hurt. However, the second part also includes the first part’s imprisonment terms. This means if life imprisonment is not imposed, the sentence should not exceed 10 years.

In a recent case, the accused challenged a 14-year imprisonment sentence under the second part of Section 307 IPC. The convict argued that since life imprisonment was not imposed, the sentence should not surpass 10 years. The Supreme Court found merit in the appeal. Noting that a 14-year sentence was impermissible if life imprisonment was not awarded.

Observation

Justice CT Ravikumar, authored the judgment. He stated, “The imposition of rigorous imprisonment for 14 years for a conviction under Section 307 IPC is impermissible in law and it is liable to be interfered with.” The court recognized the serious injuries sustained by the victim. This is including paralysis due to a spine injury. But concluded that the appellants should receive the maximum sentence of 10 years as prescribed under the first part of Section 307 IPC.

The Supreme Court converted the appellants’ 14-year rigorous imprisonment sentences to 10 years. They maintained the fines imposed by the trial court. This ruling establishes a clear sentencing framework for attempted murder convictions. When life imprisonment is not deemed appropriate.

You Might Also Like

Employee’s Widow Is Entitled To Pension & Compensation For Extreme Service Conditions: Delhi High Court

Grabbing Breasts Of Minor And Dragging Not Attempt To Rape: SC Takes Cognizance of HC Order

Chief Justice Highlights Judicial Process Issues At Special Lok Adalat Event

Violations Of Service Rules Do Not Qualify As Public Duty Under Article 226: MP High Court

Supreme Court Seeks Government Response On AYUSH Drug Approval Rules Amid Patanjali Misleading Ads Case

TAGGED:attempted murderImprisonmentlife sentencemurderSupreme Court
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Supreme Court To Examine Right To Be Forgotten In Court Judgments Supreme Court To Examine Right To Be Forgotten In Court Judgments
Next Article Supreme Court Urges Madhya Pradesh High Court To Reconsider Termination Of Female Judges Supreme Court Urges Madhya Pradesh High Court To Reconsider Termination Of Female Judges
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court
Cyber CrimeHigh CourtNewsWomen Rights

Sending Obscene WhatsApp Messages Insults Woman’s Modesty, Violates Section 509 of IPC: Mumbai HC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Supreme Court Grants Leave In Caste-Based Survey Challenge, Hearing Set For September 4
Supreme Court Expresses Concern Over ‘Inhuman Working Hours’ Of Resident Doctors During RG Kar Hospital Case Hearing
Proving Presence Of Matrimonial Disputes Not Enough to Hold Accused Guilty: Madras High Court
Supreme Court Seeks Government Response On AYUSH Drug Approval Rules Amid Patanjali Misleading Ads Case
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?