By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Supreme Court Issues Notice On Establishing Adequate Forensic Science Labs
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Supreme Court Issues Notice On Establishing Adequate Forensic Science Labs
News

Supreme Court Issues Notice On Establishing Adequate Forensic Science Labs

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: April 5, 2025 8:50 pm
Amna Kabeer
12 months ago
Share
Supreme Court Issues Notice On Establishing Adequate Forensic Science Labs
Supreme Court Issues Notice On Establishing Adequate Forensic Science Labs
SHARE

The Supreme Court has issued a notice to the Union Government and all States. It addresses the necessity for adequate Forensic Science Labs (FSL) with sufficient technical staff. This step arises from concerns regarding whether chargesheets in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) cases. This can be deemed incomplete under Section 173 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) if they lack FSL.

The bench, comprises Justices Surya Kant, Sudhanshu Dhulia, and Ujjal Bhuyan. They are examining multiple petitions related to bail for accused individuals in various NDPS cases nationwide. On Thursday, the Court proposed to hear input from all states and union territories before issuing directives. Additionally, the Court will address other critical issues regarding the fairness and efficiency of NDPS trials.

Issue

One key issue is the establishment of sufficient forensic science labs /Examiner Laboratories by State Governments. Also, with the hiring of necessary technical staff. The Court stressed the need to evaluate the current status of these laboratories and the procedures for the timely submission of FSL/Examiner’s Reports.

The Court also highlighted the importance of reviewing the states’ compliance with earlier directives from the 2016 case, Union of India v. Mohan Lal & Anr., (2016) 3 SCC 379. In the Mohan Lal case, the Supreme Court had issued several directions for the proper handling and storage of seized narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, including sampling under Magistrate supervision and secure storage facilities.

On Thursday, the Supreme Court directed the Registry to issue notices to the Union of India, all States, and Union Territories, with responses due by August 29, 2024. Notices were also issued regarding interim bail pleas from the accused, returnable on the same date. The matters are scheduled for hearing on August 29, 2024, at 3:00 PM.

It is noteworthy that in March this year, a two-judge bench referred to a three-judge bench another petition. This questions whether an FSL report is required to be filed with the charge sheet under the NDPS Act.

You Might Also Like

Eligibility for Learner’s License and Driving License in India (Section 9 & 10)

Employer’s Financial Position Strong factor in Determining Wage Structure of Employees: Supreme Court

Visually Impaired Candidates are Eligible For Judicial Service: Supreme Court Strikes Down MP Rule

Woman’s Right to Shared Household Remains Valid Even In Absence Of Domestic Violence: Delhi High Court

Supreme Court Warns Baba Ramdev and Patanjali MD for Contempt, Stresses Respect for Allopathy

TAGGED:Forensic SciencePublic InfrastructureScienceSupreme Court
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Supreme Court of India Supreme Court Clarifies Limits Of Promissory Estoppel And Legitimate Expectation In Light Of Legislative Changes
Next Article Kerala High Court Amends Selection Rules For Civil Judge Appointments Kerala High Court Amends Selection Rules For Civil Judge Appointments
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Legal Considerations For NRI Inter-Caste Marriages
High CourtJammu & Kashmir High CourtNews

Caste Status Determined by Birth, Does Not Change With Marriage: J&K High Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Supreme Court Directs NTA To Revise NEET-UG 2024 Results Due To Ambiguous Question
No Maintenance for Educated Wife Choosing Unemployment: Delhi HC
Pension As Hard Earned Benefit Can’t Be Recovered Without Due Process: Chhattisgarh HC
No Strict Proof Needed for Brides Claiming Gold Entrusted To In-Laws: Kerala HC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Section 121 – Code of Civil Procedure – Effect Of Rules In First Schedule.

Section 120 – Code of Civil Procedure – Provisions Not Applicable To High Court In Original Civil Jurisdiction.

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?