By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Supreme Court Grants Leave In Caste-Based Survey Challenge, Hearing Set For September 4
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Supreme Court Grants Leave In Caste-Based Survey Challenge, Hearing Set For September 4
News

Supreme Court Grants Leave In Caste-Based Survey Challenge, Hearing Set For September 4

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: March 29, 2025 3:11 pm
Amna Kabeer
12 months ago
Share
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
SHARE

Supreme Court Grants Leave In Caste-Based Survey Challenge

Contents
Petitioner argumentsKey issuesBackground:

Today, the Supreme Court granted leave to multiple petitions regarding the constitutionality of a caste-based survey challenge. This was conducted by the Bihar government in 2023. The next hearing is scheduled for September 4. 

The bench, comprised justices Sanjiv Khanna and Sanjay Kumar. They addressed special leave petitions from NGOs Youth for Equality, Ek Soch Ek Prayas, and others. Thus, contesting a Patna High Court ruling that upheld the survey.

Previously, the Supreme Court had refused to halt the publication or implementation of the survey data. This was pending a detailed hearing. In January, the Court had questioned the government’s authority to withhold detailed survey data.

Petitioner arguments

Senior Advocate Aparajita Singh, represented the petitioners. She argued that while surveys are permissible, they cannot mandate every citizen to disclose their caste. Moreover, citing the Indra Sawhney judgment. She emphasized that affirmative action existed before the survey and invoked the right to privacy. Thus, questioning whether the state can compel citizens to reveal their caste identities.

Justice Khanna responded by noting that privacy is an individual right and can be waived, pointing out that most people do not oppose disclosing their caste. Singh referenced a socio-economic caste census in Maharashtra, where 11% of respondents chose “no caste,” highlighting that the Bihar survey lacked this option and allowed authorities to seek information from neighbors, which she claimed violated privacy rights.

Key issues

The bench outlined key issues for consideration, including:

  1. Whether state executives can conduct surveys for legislative purposes and under what circumstances such exercises are prohibited, keeping in mind the doctrine of proportionality.
  2. When data collection may be considered unlawful, especially if it infringes upon the Constitution’s basic structure.
  3. The extent to which citizens can request detailed data breakdowns or verify data authenticity and reliability.

The hearing was adjourned due to time constraints, with Senior Advocate Shyam Divan representing the State of Bihar.

Background:

Chief Minister Nitish Kumar’s Bihar government initiated the caste-based survey on January 7, 2023, aiming to digitally compile data on each family using a mobile application. The Patna High Court upheld the survey as valid and competently initiated, dismissing the petitions against it. The High Court noted that collecting relevant data is essential for designing affirmative action under Article 16 or beneficial legislation under Article 15. Subsequent petitions challenging this decision were filed in the Supreme Court.

You Might Also Like

Live-in Relationships Go Against “Settled Law in Indian Middle Class Society.”, Allahabad HC

Capital Punishment Needs To Be Rarest of Rare Case: Madhya Pradesh HC Replaces Death Penalty with 25-Year Imprisonment in POCSO Case

Supreme Court Orders Husband To Pay Rs. 2 Crores As Alimony

Plea Against MM Lawrence’s Body Donation For Medical Research Rejected By Supreme Court

Centre Defends Marital Rape Exception, Claims Alternative Remedies Exist for Protecting Women

TAGGED:casteCourt HearingCourt Hearingsleave grantSupreme CourtSurvey
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Supreme Court Directs NTA To Revise NEET-UG 2024 Results Due To Ambiguous Question Supreme Court Directs NTA To Revise NEET-UG 2024 Results Due To Ambiguous Question
Next Article Delhi High Court case Delhi High Court Transfers Investigation Of Faizan’s Death To CBI
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Employer Cannot Withhold Gratuity Without Recovery Proceedings: Karnataka High Court
High CourtKarnataka High CourtNews

Employer Cannot Withhold Gratuity Without Recovery Proceedings: Karnataka High Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
6 months ago
Absence Due To Imprisonment Does Not Create Right To Wages: Allahabad High Court
Centre Defends Marital Rape Exception, Claims Alternative Remedies Exist for Protecting Women
Gujarat High Court Issues Notices To Times Of India and Indian Express Editors Over Misrepresentation Of Court Proceedings
Liquor Policy Case: Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal Moves Supreme Court Against ED Arrest
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Section 149 – Code of Civil Procedure – Power To Make Up Deficiency Of Court-Fees.

Section 148A – Code of Civil Procedure – Right To Lodge A Caveat.

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?