By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Supreme Court Grants Leave In Caste-Based Survey Challenge, Hearing Set For September 4
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Supreme Court Grants Leave In Caste-Based Survey Challenge, Hearing Set For September 4
News

Supreme Court Grants Leave In Caste-Based Survey Challenge, Hearing Set For September 4

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: March 29, 2025 3:11 pm
Amna Kabeer
11 months ago
Share
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
SHARE

Supreme Court Grants Leave In Caste-Based Survey Challenge

Contents
Petitioner argumentsKey issuesBackground:

Today, the Supreme Court granted leave to multiple petitions regarding the constitutionality of a caste-based survey challenge. This was conducted by the Bihar government in 2023. The next hearing is scheduled for September 4. 

The bench, comprised justices Sanjiv Khanna and Sanjay Kumar. They addressed special leave petitions from NGOs Youth for Equality, Ek Soch Ek Prayas, and others. Thus, contesting a Patna High Court ruling that upheld the survey.

Previously, the Supreme Court had refused to halt the publication or implementation of the survey data. This was pending a detailed hearing. In January, the Court had questioned the government’s authority to withhold detailed survey data.

Petitioner arguments

Senior Advocate Aparajita Singh, represented the petitioners. She argued that while surveys are permissible, they cannot mandate every citizen to disclose their caste. Moreover, citing the Indra Sawhney judgment. She emphasized that affirmative action existed before the survey and invoked the right to privacy. Thus, questioning whether the state can compel citizens to reveal their caste identities.

Justice Khanna responded by noting that privacy is an individual right and can be waived, pointing out that most people do not oppose disclosing their caste. Singh referenced a socio-economic caste census in Maharashtra, where 11% of respondents chose “no caste,” highlighting that the Bihar survey lacked this option and allowed authorities to seek information from neighbors, which she claimed violated privacy rights.

Key issues

The bench outlined key issues for consideration, including:

  1. Whether state executives can conduct surveys for legislative purposes and under what circumstances such exercises are prohibited, keeping in mind the doctrine of proportionality.
  2. When data collection may be considered unlawful, especially if it infringes upon the Constitution’s basic structure.
  3. The extent to which citizens can request detailed data breakdowns or verify data authenticity and reliability.

The hearing was adjourned due to time constraints, with Senior Advocate Shyam Divan representing the State of Bihar.

Background:

Chief Minister Nitish Kumar’s Bihar government initiated the caste-based survey on January 7, 2023, aiming to digitally compile data on each family using a mobile application. The Patna High Court upheld the survey as valid and competently initiated, dismissing the petitions against it. The High Court noted that collecting relevant data is essential for designing affirmative action under Article 16 or beneficial legislation under Article 15. Subsequent petitions challenging this decision were filed in the Supreme Court.

You Might Also Like

IUML Challenges CAA in Supreme Court, Alleges Flaws in Protecting Persecuted Minorities

Mere Threats Insufficient For Abetment To Suicide Charge: Calcutta High Court

Supreme Court To Examine Alimony In Void Marriages, Seeks Resolution Of Conflicting Judgments

Supreme Court Upholds Regularisation Of Daily Wage Worker By MP High Court

Delhi High Court Interprets Section 531(2)(a) Of BNSS 2023, Emphasises Applicability To Pending Appeals

TAGGED:casteCourt HearingCourt Hearingsleave grantSupreme CourtSurvey
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Supreme Court Directs NTA To Revise NEET-UG 2024 Results Due To Ambiguous Question Supreme Court Directs NTA To Revise NEET-UG 2024 Results Due To Ambiguous Question
Next Article Delhi High Court case Delhi High Court Transfers Investigation Of Faizan’s Death To CBI
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court Halts Contempt Proceedings Against DDA Vice Chairman, Seeks CJI's Clarification
News

Supreme Court Halts Contempt Proceedings Against DDA Vice Chairman, Seeks CJI’s Clarification

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
11 months ago
Supreme Court Seeks Government Response On AYUSH Drug Approval Rules Amid Patanjali Misleading Ads Case
Complainant Cannot Demand Hearing in Bail Cases Under Juvenile Justice Act: Delhi HC
Abetment Of Suicide Charges Must Not Be Used Casually: Supreme Court Of India
Bail Conditions Cannot Mandate Maintenance Payment In Marital Disputes: Supreme Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?