By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Supreme Court Finds Gujarat Police Inspector And Magistrate Guilty Of Contempt
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Supreme Court Finds Gujarat Police Inspector And Magistrate Guilty Of Contempt
News

Supreme Court Finds Gujarat Police Inspector And Magistrate Guilty Of Contempt

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: December 22, 2024 3:04 pm
Amna Kabeer
11 months ago
Share
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
SHARE

New Delhi, August 07, 2024: In a significant ruling today, the Supreme Court held the Police Inspector of Vesu Police Station in Gujarat. They also held the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Surat guilty of Contempt of Court. The judgement was passed due to their actions of arresting and remanding an accused. Hence,  disregarding an interim anticipatory bail order issued by the Supreme Court.

The Court has directed the contemnors to appear on September 02, 2024, to determine their sentences.

The case revolves around a petitioner accused of cheating, who sought anticipatory bail from the Supreme Court. This was after being denied by the Gujarat High Court. On December 8, 2023, the Supreme Court issued a notice and granted him interim anticipatory bail. Thus  requiring his cooperation with the investigation.

Despite this order, the petitioner claimed that on December 12, 2023, he was summoned to appear before the Magistrate due to a police custody application. Subsequently, the Magistrate remanded him to police custody for four days until December 16. The petitioner alleged that during his time in custody, he faced threats and physical assault.

Conclusion

On January 10, a Bench comprised Justices BR Gavai and Sandeep Mehta. They issued contempt notices to several officials. This included the Additional Chief Secretary of the Gujarat Government’s Home Department, the Commissioner and Deputy Commissioner of Police in Surat. It also had the Police Inspector of Vesu Police Station. Additionally, a contempt notice was issued to the 6th Additional Chief Magistrate of Surat. It was issued for remanding the petitioner despite the Supreme Court’s interim order.

Following a detailed hearing, the Supreme Court reserved its judgement on March 12, ultimately finding the officials guilty of contempt.

The contemnors are required to be present in court on September 02, 2024, where their sentences will be decided.

You Might Also Like

Baggage Rules Do Not Cover Jewellery Worn On Person: Madras High Court

Woman Can Claim Maintenance from Second Husband Even If First Marriage Was Not Legally Dissolved: Supreme Court

Mosque Falls Under ‘Waqf’, Disputes to Be Heard by Waqf Tribunal: Rajasthan HC

Human Rights Courts Under the Protection of Human Rights Act: Structure and Jurisdiction (Section 30)

Supreme Court Receives Appeal Against Allahabad High Court’s Ruling Invalidating Uttar Pradesh Madarsa Act

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Supreme Court Criticises Low Conviction Rate In Money Laundering Cases, Urges ED To Improve Prosecution Quality Supreme Court Criticises Low Conviction Rate In Money Laundering Cases, Urges ED To Improve Prosecution Quality
Next Article Supreme Court Enforces Stricter Conditions for Tree Felling In Public Projects, Cites Right To Healthy Environment Supreme Court Enforces Stricter Conditions for Tree Felling In Public Projects, Cites Right To Healthy Environment
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court
Cyber CrimeHigh CourtNewsWomen Rights

Sending Obscene WhatsApp Messages Insults Woman’s Modesty, Violates Section 509 of IPC: Mumbai HC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Contraband Recovery from Accused Must Be Considered Individually for Bail: J&K High Court
Proton Mail Not Blocked in India, Union Govt Informs Karnataka HC
Chief Justice Highlights Judicial Process Issues At Special Lok Adalat Event
Supreme Court Issues Notice In West Bengal’s Challenge Over Governor’s Withholding Of Bill Assent
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Humayun Merchant In Money Laundering Case

Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Cannot Be Invoked Unless Clear Evidence Of Miscarriage Of Justice: J&K HC

Information Technology Act Of 2000: Key Provisions, Responsibilities, And Amendments

Section 67A of the Information Technology Act, Penalizes Publication of Sexually Explicit Material in Electronic Form

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?