By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Supreme Court Directs Bar Association Election Disputes To Civil Courts, Keeps Legal Question Open
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Supreme Court Directs Bar Association Election Disputes To Civil Courts, Keeps Legal Question Open
News

Supreme Court Directs Bar Association Election Disputes To Civil Courts, Keeps Legal Question Open

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: December 17, 2024 11:57 pm
Amna Kabeer
12 months ago
Share
Supreme Court Directs Bar Association Election Disputes To Civil Courts, Keeps Legal Question Open
Supreme Court Directs Bar Association Election Disputes To Civil Courts, Keeps Legal Question Open
SHARE

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court has clarified disputes concerning Bar Association elections. It should be taken to civil courts, not constitutional courts under Article 226. The bench, consisted of Justices Abhay S Oka and AG Masihn. They specifically addressed the case involving the Alipore Bar Association. This ultimately disposed the plea while leaving related legal questions unresolved.

Background

The case originated when Subir Sengupta filed a writ petition with the Calcutta High Court. It  challenged the Alipore Bar Association’s election processes. Sengupta argued that around 400 members were improperly included in the voter list. This was despite the fact mostly had not cleared the All India Bar Examination (AIBE). The High Court responded by annulling the election notice. They tasked the Bar Council of West Bengal with determining the voting eligibility. It was of those who had not cleared the AIBE.

This decision was later appealed by the Alipore Bar Association, and the Division Bench of the High Court ruled that the writ petition under Article 226 was not maintainable against the Bar Association. The court indicated that election disputes should be brought before a competent civil court within the legally prescribed timeframe.

Unhappy with this outcome, the petitioner approached the Supreme Court. Senior Advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, representing the petitioner, argued that the core issue was the inclusion of non-AIBE members in the voter list, not an internal electoral dispute. He highlighted previous High Court rulings that were not enforced, asserting that the writ petition sought to implement those directions.

Justice Oka commented that courts should not be further burdened with Bar Association election disputes, emphasising that such matters should be resolved in civil courts. Following this, Sankaranarayanan withdrew the plea, noting that four other High Courts had ruled differently on similar issues. He requested that the Supreme Court leave the legal question open, which the bench agreed to do in its final order.

You Might Also Like

Supreme Court Criticises Poor Conditions In Assam’s Detention Centers, Orders Fresh Review

Proving Presence Of Matrimonial Disputes Not Enough to Hold Accused Guilty: Madras High Court

Supreme Court Grants Leave In Caste-Based Survey Challenge, Hearing Set For September 4

Supreme Court Imposes Fine On Gujarat Police Officer For Contempt, Accepts Magistrate’s Apology

Forcing Couples To Stay Together Amount To “Mental Cruelty”, Creates Fictional Bond By Law: Punjab And Haryana HC

Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Supreme Court BNSS Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Delhi High Court Interprets Section 531(2)(a) Of BNSS 2023, Emphasises Applicability To Pending Appeals
Next Article Supreme Court Issues Notice On Petition Against Cancellation Of NEET-SS 2024 Supreme Court Issues Notice On Petition Against Cancellation Of NEET-SS 2024
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
How To File For Divorce In India
Marriage and DivorceNewsPatna High Court

Mental Disorders Like Schizophrenia Not Enough for Divorce, Living Conditions Must Be Severe: Patna High Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
3 months ago
Property Title Transfer Invalid Without Legal Ownership Of Seller: Patna HC
Non-Consensual Unnatural Sex by Husband Punishable under Section 377 IPC: Allahabad HC
Past Irregular Promotions Cannot Justify Future Violations: Supreme Court
Supreme Court Orders Rehabilitation Before Evictions For Haldwani Railway Station Development
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Section 111A – Code of Civil Procedure – [Omitted.].

Section 111 – Code of Civil Procedure – [Omitted.].

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?