By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Mosque Falls Under ‘Waqf’, Disputes to Be Heard by Waqf Tribunal: Rajasthan HC
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Rajasthan High Court > Mosque Falls Under ‘Waqf’, Disputes to Be Heard by Waqf Tribunal: Rajasthan HC
High CourtMuslim LawNewsRajasthan High Court

Mosque Falls Under ‘Waqf’, Disputes to Be Heard by Waqf Tribunal: Rajasthan HC

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: February 28, 2025 9:44 pm
Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Share
Rajasthan High Court
Rajasthan High Court
SHARE

Jaipur: The Rajasthan High Court has ruled that a mosque, being a place of religious worship, falls under the definition of ‘Waqf’ as per Section 3(r) of the Waqf Act, 1995. The Waqf Tribunal must exclusively adjudicate disputes regarding such properties.

Contents
Court’s RulingTrial Court’s ErrorKey ObservationsImplications and Recent Legislative Developments


Court’s Ruling


A bench of Justice Birendra Kumar cited Section 85 of the Waqf Act. It bars civil courts, revenue courts, or other authorities from hearing cases related to waqf properties. The Court clarified that the jurisdiction for such disputes lies solely with the Waqf Tribunal.
The ruling came in response to a civil revision petition challenging a lower court’s refusal. This was to reject a plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The case involved the Madina Zama Masjid, allegedly built with contributions from the local Muslim community. The petitioners (original defendants) claimed ownership of the mosque property. But, the plaintiffs sought an injunction to prevent any interference with religious activities.


Trial Court’s Error


The civil court dismissed the petitioners’ plea because officials had not registered the mosque as waqf property. The High Court, however, held that permanent dedication of immovable property for religious use qualifies it as waqf. This is regardless of its registration status. As a result, the civil court lacked jurisdiction.


Key Observations


The Court ruled that:
The Waqf Act covers a mosque as a place of religious worship. The Waqf Tribunal must address disputes related to waqf properties.
The civil court erred in hearing the case, violating the bar under Section 85 of the Waqf Act.
The High Court allowed the civil revision petition, directing the rejection of the plaint and granting liberty to the plaintiffs to approach the Waqf Tribunal within four weeks.


Implications and Recent Legislative Developments


Under Islamic law, donors irrevocably dedicate waqf properties for religious or charitable purposes. A ‘mutawalli’ is appointed to manage such properties.
In August 2024, the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024, and the Mussalman Wakf (Repeal) Bill, 2024, were introduced in the Lok Sabha to streamline waqf management. This change could impact historically recognized waqf properties like mosques and graveyards that lack formal documentation.
The High Court’s decision reinforces the jurisdictional framework under the Waqf Act while aligning with ongoing legal reforms in waqf administration.

You Might Also Like

Supreme Court Calls For Reform Suggestions From Bar Associations Across India

Section 479 BNSS Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively to Convicted Prisoners: Kerala High Court

Section 27 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Powers Of Officers Appointed

Supreme Court Directs NMC to Provide Stipend Details for MBBS Interns Across States

Rape on False Promise of Marriage’ Does Not Apply to Married Women: Kerala High Court

TAGGED:High CourtmosqueMuslim Prayerswaqf
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Supreme Court of India No Personal Presence Required in Domestic Violence Proceedings: SC
Next Article Allahabad High Court Clears Path For Suits In Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Eidgah Mosque Dispute Civil Court Decree Necessary for Name Change in Board Certificates: Allahabad High Court
7 Comments
  • Pingback: What Is The Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025? - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: Empowering Self-Representation: Laws, Principles And Inspiring Precedents - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: The Enduring Influence Of Judicial Precedents On Indian Jurisprudence - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: The Binding Nature And Challenges Of Judicial Precedents In India - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: An Overview On Special Leave Petition - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: Allahabad High Court Clears Path For Suits In Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Eidgah Mosque Dispute - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: No Fundamental Right to Live-In Relationship With a Married Woman: Rajasthan High Court - ApniLaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
High Court of Karnataka
CivilHigh CourtKarnataka High CourtNews

Nomination Does Not Override Legal Heirs’ Rights: Karnataka HC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
5 months ago
Supreme Court Allows Sub-Classification Of Scheduled Castes For Targeted Quotas
Supreme Court Orders Construction Of Inclusive Toilets In Court Premises
IPC 420, Mere Breach of Contract Not Enough Unless Clear Intent Is Present For Criminal Charges: Gauhati HC
Supreme Court Adjourns Hearing On Haryana’s Plea Against High Court’s Shambhu Border Unblock Order
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Landmark Supreme Court Judgements In Cheque Bounce Cases (Case Overview)

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Compounding Of Cheque Bounce Offence: Section 147 of the Negotiable Instrument Act

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?