By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Police Must Uphold Human Dignity While Maintaining Law, Says Madras High Court
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Madras High Court > Police Must Uphold Human Dignity While Maintaining Law, Says Madras High Court
CriminalMadras High CourtNews

Police Must Uphold Human Dignity While Maintaining Law, Says Madras High Court

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: July 1, 2025 3:14 pm
Amna Kabeer
3 weeks ago
Share
Police Station
Police Station
SHARE

The Madras High Court upheld the State Human Rights Commission’s (SHRC) order granting ₹1,00,000 compensation to a custodial torture victim. The division bench, led by Justice J Nisha Banu, stated that police must maintain law and order while protecting human dignity. The male victim alleged unlawful detention at 3 AM on December 20, 2013. Police reportedly stripped and assaulted him in custody. Later, they took him to a secluded area near a city police station and continued the torture. After reviewing the case, the SHRC found a clear violation of human dignity and fundamental rights. It directed the State to compensate the victim and recover the amount from the responsible officers. The officers challenged the order, calling it unjustified. However, the High Court noted their delay in filing the petition. The court also pointed out the lack of valid medical evidence in their defense. The bench confirmed that the SHRC’s findings were fair and legally sound. It dismissed the officers’ petitions and upheld the compensation order.

This verdict reinforces police accountability and highlights the legal consequences of custodial violence. It sends a strong message that human rights violations will not go unpunished.

You Might Also Like

Pending FIR Not A Bar For Passport Renewal: Jammu And Kashmir High Court Rules On Passport Issuance Amid Pending Investigations

Data Privacy: Understanding And Implementing Essential Practices

Supreme Court Clarifies: Overtaking Alone Doesn’t Constitute Rash Or Negligent Driving

Family Courts To Summon Children Only In Rare And Exceptional Situations: Kerala HC

Supreme Court Orders Husband To Pay Rs. 2 Crores As Alimony

TAGGED:Custodial TortureDetentionHuman dignityHuman Life SafetyHuman RightsMadras high courtPolicePolice Accountability
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Muslim Woman Can Claim Damages From Bigamy Marriage, Rules Madras High Court Muslim Woman’s Right to Khula Is Absolute, Not Dependent On Husband’s Consent: Telangana HC
Next Article Supreme Court Rejects ED's Review Petition: PMLA Not Applicable Without Scheduled Offence Link Right to Travel Abroad Falls Under Personal Liberty, Says Rajasthan High Court
4 Comments
  • Pingback: Taking Bribes Is a Crime: Understanding Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: Section 28 CrPC: Sentences High Courts ...
  • Pingback: Section 25A CrPC: Directorate of Prosecution
  • Pingback: Right to Travel Abroad Falls Under Personal Liberty, Says Rajasthan High Court - ApniLaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Abetment Of Suicide Charges Must Not Be Used Casually: Supreme Court Of India
CriminalNewsPunjab & Haryana High Court

Abetment Of Suicide Requires Clear Evidence Of Instigation, Mere Conflicts Cannot Constitute Abetment: Punjab & Haryana HC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Engaged In Sexually Explicit Discussions On The Show: Gauhati High Court Grants Interim Anticipatory Bail To YouTuber Ashish Chanchlani
Muslim Woman Can Claim Damages From Bigamy Marriage, Rules Madras High Court
Chief Justice Highlights Judicial Process Issues At Special Lok Adalat Event
Undressing Victim Without Intercourse Is Attempt to Rape: Allahabad High Court
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Section 121 – Code of Civil Procedure – Effect Of Rules In First Schedule.

Section 120 – Code of Civil Procedure – Provisions Not Applicable To High Court In Original Civil Jurisdiction.

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?