By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Plea Against Multiple FIRs: Supreme Court Issues Notice On Ashish Chanchlani
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > News > Plea Against Multiple FIRs: Supreme Court Issues Notice On Ashish Chanchlani
NewsSupreme Court

Plea Against Multiple FIRs: Supreme Court Issues Notice On Ashish Chanchlani

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: February 23, 2025 2:30 pm
Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Share
India's Got Latent Controversy
India's Got Latent Controversy
SHARE

The Supreme Court on Friday (February 21) issued notice on YouTuber Ashish Chanchlani’s plea to club multiple FIRs filed against him for obscenity. The case concerns remarks made during an episode of the YouTube show India’s Got Latent.
Petitioner Seeks Clubbing and Transfer of FIRs

Contents
Chanchlani’s request to the Supreme CourtAnticipatory Bail and High Court RulingEpisode Sparked ControversyLegal Action and Multiple FIRsSupreme Court Grants Interim Protection to Allahabadia


Chanchlani’s request to the Supreme Court

Chanchlani requested the Supreme Court to merge the FIRs registered in Guwahati and Mumbai and transfer them to Mumbai. A bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh issued notices to the respondents and tagged the case with a similar petition filed by co-accused Ranveer Allahabadia.


Anticipatory Bail and High Court Ruling


Initially, Chanchlani approached the Gauhati High Court for anticipatory bail in connection with the Assam FIR. He argued that co-panelist Allahabadia made the controversial remarks and that he had no involvement in editing or post-production. Earlier this week, the High Court granted him interim anticipatory bail and directed him to appear before the Investigating Officer within 10 days.


Episode Sparked Controversy


The controversial remarks appeared in an episode of comedian Samay Raina’s YouTube show India’s Got Latent. The episode featured YouTube celebrities Ranveer Allahabadia, Ashish Chanchlani, Jaspreet Singh, and Apoorva Makhija. Viral video clips from the episode triggered massive outrage, leading to widespread criticism of Allahabadia and Raina. In response, Raina issued a public apology and deleted all episodes of India’s Got Latent. Allahabadia also apologized, acknowledging that his comments were inappropriate.


Legal Action and Multiple FIRs


On February 10, Assam police registered an FIR against five YouTubers and content creators for “promoting obscenity and engaging in sexually explicit and vulgar discussions.” The FIR invoked multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), IT Act, Cinematograph Act, and Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act. Alok Boruah, the complainant, accused Chanchlani, Singh, Makhija, Allahabadia, Raina, and others of promoting obscene content.
Following this, Maharashtra Cyber Department and Jaipur Police also registered cases related to the controversy.


Supreme Court Grants Interim Protection to Allahabadia


On the same day Chanchlani secured relief from the Gauhati High Court, the Supreme Court granted interim protection from arrest to Allahabadia. The Court issued notices to the Union of India, Maharashtra, and Assam, seeking their response. The bench also questioned the Union about the lack of regulation for online content. While granting protection, Justice Surya Kant criticized Allahabadia’s language, calling it “dirty” and “perverted.”
The case continues as the Supreme Court examines the legal implications of online content and freedom of expression.

You Might Also Like

Supreme Court Upholds Executing Court’s Decision To Extend Payment Time In Contract Case

Proton Mail Not Blocked in India, Union Govt Informs Karnataka HC

Section 482 CrPC: High Court’s Inherent Power – Explained

District Magistrate May Release Property If Satisfied With genuineness Under Gangster And Anti-Social Activities Act: Allahabad High Court

CrPC Section 366: Death Sentence Confirmation by Court of Session

TAGGED:Offensive ContentOnlineSupreme Court
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Understanding the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act Excluding Legal Heir Without Reasons Can Be Overturned: Jammu and Kashmir High Court
Next Article Section 212 - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) - Furnishing False Information Section 212 – Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) – Furnishing False Information.
3 Comments
  • Pingback: Obscenity Case: Gauhati High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to YouTuber Ashish Chanchlani - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: Step-Parent Adoption Requires Biological Parent’s Consent: Kerala HC - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: Dismissal Revokes Pension Rights Under Rule 2.5 of the Punjab Civil Services Rules: Punjab & Haryana High Court - ApniLaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Abetment Of Suicide Charges Must Not Be Used Casually: Supreme Court Of India
CriminalNewsPunjab & Haryana High Court

Abetment Of Suicide Requires Clear Evidence Of Instigation, Mere Conflicts Cannot Constitute Abetment: Punjab & Haryana HC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
3 months ago
Baggage Rules Do Not Cover Jewellery Worn On Person: Madras High Court
Any Authority Could Be Empowered To Issue Certificates For Muslim Marriages : Karnataka Waqf Board To HC
Women’s Safety in Public Spaces Must Be Ensured Through Right To Live And Move Freely: Delhi High Court
Supreme Court Upholds NEET-UG Exam Despite Paper Leak Allegations
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.
login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?