By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: No Need to Prove Negligence for Compensation Under Section 163-A: Punjab & Haryana High Court
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Punjab & Haryana High Court > No Need to Prove Negligence for Compensation Under Section 163-A: Punjab & Haryana High Court
High CourtNewsPunjab & Haryana High Court

No Need to Prove Negligence for Compensation Under Section 163-A: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: February 5, 2025 12:22 pm
Amna Kabeer
3 months ago
Share
Punjab and Haryana High Court
Punjab and Haryana High Court
SHARE

Punjab & Haryana High Court Clarifies Compensation Rules. No Need to Prove Negligence for Compensation Under Section 163-A


The Punjab & Haryana High Court has ruled that claimants need not prove the driver’s negligence to receive compensation under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act. This decision ensures that victims or their legal heirs can secure compensation without proving fault.

Contents
Punjab & Haryana High Court Clarifies Compensation Rules. No Need to Prove Negligence for Compensation Under Section 163-ACourt’s Key Observations: Punjab & Haryana High Court Clarifies Compensation RulesJudgment in Insurance Company’s PleaImpact on Insurance Claims


Court’s Key Observations: Punjab & Haryana High Court Clarifies Compensation Rules


Section 163-A makes the vehicle owner or insurer liable for compensation in case of death or permanent disability due to an accident.
Victims do not need to establish negligence or wrongful act to claim compensation.
The liability is based solely on the fact that the vehicle was in use at the time of the accident.


Judgment in Insurance Company’s Plea


The ruling came while hearing a batch of petitions filed by United India Insurance Co. Ltd. The insurer challenged a tribunal’s compensation award linked to a 2013 accident. A tractor was allegedly left parked in the middle of the road without warning signs, leading to the accident.
The court found that the tribunal’s compensation award was justified under Section 163-A. Even though fault is not a factor, compensation is fixed based on a structured formula in the Second Schedule of the Act:
Rs. 50,000 in case of death
Rs. 25,000 for permanent disability


Impact on Insurance Claims


The court emphasized that medical expenses must be supported by valid documents. If proven, insurers cannot challenge the claim. It also clarified that amendments made to the Act in 2019 do not apply to cases from earlier years.
This decision reinforces the rights of accident victims to receive swift compensation without legal hurdles.

You Might Also Like

Wife’s Waiver of Maintenance Rights Has No Legal Value: Kerala High Court

Financial Security Alone Not Important But Physical And Mental Factors To Maintain Custody of Child: Punjab And Haryana HC

Bail is Rule, Jail is Exception: Supreme Court Upholds In UAPA Case

No Fundamental Right to Live-In Relationship With a Married Woman: Rajasthan High Court

Section 273 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Compensation For Accusation Without Reasonable Cause.

TAGGED:CompensationMotor accidentMotor accident claimsMotor vehicleMotor Vehicles ActNegligencePunjab and Haryana High court
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Section 440 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) - Sessions Judge'S Powers Of Revision Section 440 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) – Sessions Judge’S Powers Of Revision.
Next Article High Court of Delhi Lack of Birth Certificate No Bar for Sports Participation: Delhi High Court
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Live-in Relationships
Allahabad High CourtFamilyNews

Two Consenting Adults Free to Live Together Without Marriage Despite Of Religious Differences: Allahabad HC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
1 month ago
Kerala High Court Amends Selection Rules For Civil Judge Appointments
Exhumation Of Gopan Swami’s Body To Proceed, Rules Kerala High Court
Supreme Court Overturns Conviction For Use Of Permitted Food Colouring Tartrazine In Dal Moong Dhuli
Intent Must Be Proven for Mischief Under IPC Section 425: Punjab And Haryana HC
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Delhi High Court case

Delhi HC Steps In: Seat Of Devi Padmavati Must Remain Vacant, Rules Court

What Is a Financial Emergency and Has India Ever Faced One? (Article 360 Explained)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?