By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: 18 Months of Marriage, Woman Demands BMW, High-End Flat. SC Said Earn Yourself, Should Not Beg
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > Family > Alimony & Maintenance > 18 Months of Marriage, Woman Demands BMW, High-End Flat. SC Said Earn Yourself, Should Not Beg
Alimony & MaintenanceMarriage and DivorceNewsSupreme Court

18 Months of Marriage, Woman Demands BMW, High-End Flat. SC Said Earn Yourself, Should Not Beg

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: July 26, 2025 2:51 pm
Amna Kabeer
3 days ago
Share
Right to Maintenance For Women
Right to Maintenance For Women
SHARE

In a significant observation on interim maintenance, the Supreme Court of India emphasized that well-educated women should strive for self-reliance rather than seek extravagant alimony. Especially, after a short-lived marriage. The remark came during the hearing of a high-profile case where a woman, an MBA graduate and IT professional, demanded ₹12 crore, a luxury BMW, and a prime apartment in Mumbai after just 18 months of marriage. Chief Justice BR Gavai, addressing the plea, stated, “If you are educated, you should not beg for yourself. You should earn and eat for yourself.” The court questioned the legitimacy of her lavish demands. Especially given her qualifications and the fact that she already lived in a Mumbai flat with two parking spots. The husband’s counsel argued that alimony cannot be claimed in such an extravagant manner, and the woman must work.

The woman, meanwhile, claimed her husband attempted to annul the marriage by accusing her of schizophrenia, which she denied. Asserting that she had the capability to work in major IT hubs, The bench offered her two choices, either accept ₹4 crore or a burden-free flat and seek employment in IT hubs. The court also noted that withdrawing consent from a mutual divorce for better settlement amounted to misuse of legal process. The matter now awaits a final order.

You Might Also Like

Delhi High Court Upholds Reverence for Devi Padmavati Idol in Jain Temple Dispute

No Dowry Death If Dying Declaration Only Includes Routine Family Quarrel: Gujarat HC

Landmark Supreme Court Judgements In Cheque Bounce Cases (Case Overview)

Banks Can Invoke SARFAESI If Not Party to Resolution Plan: Kerala High Court

Nine Convicted In Witchcraft Murder Case Have Death Sentence Commuted By Orissa High Court

TAGGED:AlimonyAlimony DemandEducationInterim MaintenanceLavish ClaimMaintenanceSupreme CourtWomen
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Law on E-Cigarettes in India Who Can Search or Seize E-Cigarettes? Powers of Authorized Officers under Prohibition of E-Cigarettes Act (Section 7 & 8)
Next Article How To File A Case Under The Prevention Of Corruption Act? Role of Sanction for Prosecution under Prevention of Corruption Act: When Can an Officer Be Tried? (Section 19)
1 Comment
  • Pingback: Compounding Of Cheque Bounce Offence: Section 147 of the Negotiable Instrument Act - ApniLaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court Emphasises Settlement Over Punishment In Cheque Bounce Cases
News

Supreme Court Emphasises Settlement Over Punishment In Cheque Bounce Cases

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
1 year ago
The Rise Of Cryptocurrency In India: Blockchain, Legal Frameworks, And Future Prospects
Supreme Court Postpones Hearing On Savukku Shankar’s Plea Against 16 FIRs, Tamil Nadu To Submit Additional Documents
Recording and Circulating Court Proceedings via Video Conferencing is Prohibited: Kerala HC
Bail is Rule, Jail is Exception: Supreme Court Upholds In UAPA Case
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Defenses Available In Cheque Bounce Cases: How An Accused Can Fight

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Difference Between Civil Recovery and Criminal Action in Cheque Bounce Cases Under Negotiable Instruments Act

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?