By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Ask a Lawyer
  • Find a Lawyer
  • Our Services
  • Legal News
  • Knowledge Hub
    • Bare Acts
      • BNS
      • BNSS
      • BSA
      • CrPC
      • CPC
      • DPDP
      • Hindu Marriage Act
      • Hindu Succession Act
      • The Hindu Adoptions And Maintenance Act
      • The Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act
      • IPC
      • Juvenile Justice Act
      • POCSO
      • Special Marriage Act
      • The Specific Relief Act
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
    • Legal Articles
    • Students Section – Judiciary, UPSC
    • Job Updates
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
  • About Us
Reading: Wife Can Apply for a Passport Without Husband’s Signature: Madras HC
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Ask a Lawyer
  • Find a Lawyer
  • Our Services
  • Legal News
  • Knowledge Hub
  • About Us
  • Home
  • Ask a Lawyer
  • Find a Lawyer
  • Our Services
  • Legal News
  • Knowledge Hub
    • Bare Acts
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
    • Legal Articles
    • Students Section – Judiciary, UPSC
    • Job Updates
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
  • About Us
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Madras High Court > Wife Can Apply for a Passport Without Husband’s Signature: Madras HC
Madras High CourtMarriage and DivorceNewsWomen Rights

Wife Can Apply for a Passport Without Husband’s Signature: Madras HC

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: June 22, 2025 8:41 pm
Amna Kabeer
2 months ago
Share
How To Apply For A Passport Renewal In India?
How To Apply For A Passport Renewal In India?
SHARE


The Madras High Court ruled that a married woman can apply for a passport without her husband’s permission or signature. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh delivered the verdict while hearing a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petitioner, married in 2023 and a mother in 2024, faced delays in passport processing due to a pending divorce case. The Regional Passport Office had insisted on her husband’s signature in Form-J. The Court found this requirement illegal and rooted in outdated patriarchal norms. It held that marriage does not erase a woman’s individuality. The Court slammed the passport office’s demand as male supremacism and an impossible condition, especially in cases of marital discord. It emphasized that women have the right to independently apply for official documents.

The Court directed the passport office to process the petitioner’s application without her husband’s signature and issue the passport if all other formalities are met. The process must be completed within four weeks of receiving the order. This judgment strongly reinforces women’s autonomy and marks a step forward for gender equality in official procedures.

You Might Also Like

Adverse Inference Can Be Drawn If Rape Victim Refuses Medical Examination: SC Upholds Acquittal, Cites Lack of Cooperation in Medical Examination

Bodily Injuries Are Not Essential to Prove Sexual Assault: Supreme Court

PUCL Moves Calcutta High Court Seeking Investigation Into Brutal Rape And Murder Of PG Medical Student

Justice Surya Kant Stresses Ethical Balance In AI and Smart Transportation At International Legal Conference In Kerala

Should Convicted Politicians Be Allowed to Make Laws? : SC Questions

TAGGED:DivorceMadras high courtMarriagePassportPassport ApplicationPending Application
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article POSH Act - Women at Workplace Right to Voluntarily Close Business Under Article 19(1)(g): SC
Next Article Supreme Court Urges Madhya Pradesh High Court To Reconsider Termination Of Female Judges Capital Punishment Needs To Be Rarest of Rare Case: Madhya Pradesh HC Replaces Death Penalty with 25-Year Imprisonment in POCSO Case
1 Comment
  • Pingback: Capital Punishment Needs To Be Rarest of Rarest Case: Madhya Pradesh HC Replaces Death Penalty with 25-Year Imprisonment in POCSO Case - ApniLaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court of India
News

Supreme Court Declares Royalty Under MMDR Act Is Not A Tax

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
1 year ago
Divorce Petition Within One Year Requires Separate Application Under Hindu Marriage Act: Orissa HC
No Extortion Case Against Wife for Seeking Maintenance: Karnataka High Court
Supreme Court Closes 2017 PIL On Tiger Deaths, Acknowledges Significant Progress In Conservation Efforts
Supreme Court Directs Government To Resolve Pension Discrepancies For Regular Captains under OROP Scheme
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.
login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?