By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Employee Cannot Deny Family Pension to Wife or Dependents: Kerala High Court
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Kerala High Court > Employee Cannot Deny Family Pension to Wife or Dependents: Kerala High Court
FamilyHigh CourtKerala High CourtMarriage and DivorceNewsWomen Rights

Employee Cannot Deny Family Pension to Wife or Dependents: Kerala High Court

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: January 30, 2025 9:49 pm
Amna Kabeer
6 months ago
Share
Employee Cannot Deny Family Pension to Wife or Dependents: Kerala High Court
Employee Cannot Deny Family Pension to Wife or Dependents: Kerala High Court
SHARE

Employee Cannot Deny Family Pension to Wife or Dependents


The Kerala High Court ruled that an employee cannot deny or decide who receives the family pension after their death. The Court held that family pension is not the employee’s property and cannot be disposed of through a will or nomination.

Contents
Employee Cannot Deny Family Pension to Wife or DependentsFamily Pension is Not Part of Employee’s EstateCase of Gopalakrishna PillaiHigh Court Upholds Tribunal’s DecisionFamily Pension Does Not Require a Succession CertificateFinal Verdict


Family Pension is Not Part of Employee’s Estate


A Division Bench of Justice Amit Rawal and Justice K. V. Jayakumar stated that family pension is different from other pensionary benefits like gratuity or provident fund. Employees cannot exclude their legally wedded spouse or dependents from receiving it. They also cannot nominate another person to receive the pension.


Case of Gopalakrishna Pillai


The case involved Gopalakrishna Pillai, a retired Postal Assistant, who excluded his wife and daughter from his service records. He later claimed he had divorced his wife and canceled their nomination for pensionary benefits.
After his death, his wife approached the Central Administrative Tribunal for family pension. The Tribunal ruled in her favor and directed the Union of India to pay her the pension until her death or remarriage. The Union of India challenged this decision in the Kerala High Court.


High Court Upholds Tribunal’s Decision


The High Court upheld the Tribunal’s order, stating that an employee has no authority to dictate the disposal of family pension. The Court referred to Supreme Court judgments, including:
Jodh Singh v. Union of India (1980) – Family pension is not part of an employee’s estate since it is not payable during their lifetime.
Violet Issaac & Others v. Union of India (2002) – An employee cannot dispose of family pension through a will.
Nitu v. Sheela Rani & Others (2016) – Reaffirmed that family pension is not part of an estate and cannot be transferred through a testamentary disposition.


Family Pension Does Not Require a Succession Certificate


The Court also ruled that family pension is neither a debt nor a security. Therefore, authorities cannot demand a succession certificate before granting family pension to the rightful beneficiary.


Final Verdict


The Kerala High Court dismissed the petition, affirming that family pension is meant for the legally wedded spouse or eligible dependents. Employees cannot alter its distribution according to their will.

You Might Also Like

Mental Disorders Like Schizophrenia Not Enough for Divorce, Living Conditions Must Be Severe: Patna High Court

Familial Ties Don’t Rule Out Promise Of Marriage, Says Delhi High Court

Supreme Court Seeks Compliance from Ajit Pawar Group in NCP Rift Over ‘Clock’ Symbol

Section 146 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Alteration In Allowance.

Writ Petition Maintainable Against Private Banks for Unauthorized Freezing of Accounts: Allahabad HC

TAGGED:DivorceEmployeeKerala High CourtMaintenancewomen's rights
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court Section 479 BNSS Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively to Convicted Prisoners: Kerala High Court
Next Article IPC Section 498A: Cruelty By Husband Or Husband's Relatives Forcing Spouse to Convert is Cruelty: Madras High Court
2 Comments
  • Pingback: Father-in-law Has The Right To Evict His Son-in-law From His...
  • Pingback: Employee’s Widow Is Entitled To Pension & Compensation For Extreme Service Conditions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Calcutta High Court Rejects Hoichoi's Plea Against Google Play Store Delisting: RBI to Make Final Call on Payment Aggregator Issue
High CourtNews

Calcutta High Court Rejects Hoichoi’s Plea Against Google Play Store Delisting: RBI to Make Final Call on Payment Aggregator Issue

Apni Law
By Apni Law
1 year ago
Women’s Safety in Public Spaces Must Be Ensured Through Right To Live And Move Freely: Delhi High Court
Accused Must Have Lived in Shared Household for Domestic Violence Case:Allahabad High Court
Online Product Listings Can Be Claimed By Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Rules
Supreme Court Questions Excessive Reservation Under ‘Institutional Preference’ Quota In AIIMS PG Admissions
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Section 149 – Code of Civil Procedure – Power To Make Up Deficiency Of Court-Fees.

Section 148A – Code of Civil Procedure – Right To Lodge A Caveat.

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?