By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Delhi High Court Upholds Reverence for Devi Padmavati Idol in Jain Temple Dispute
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Delhi High Court > Delhi High Court Upholds Reverence for Devi Padmavati Idol in Jain Temple Dispute
Delhi High CourtNews

Delhi High Court Upholds Reverence for Devi Padmavati Idol in Jain Temple Dispute

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: May 13, 2025 9:49 pm
Amna Kabeer
2 months ago
Share
Jain Temple - Devi Padmavati Ji
Jain Temple - Devi Padmavati Ji
SHARE

Orders seat to be reserved in sanctum; criticizes trial court’s casual approach to matter of Jain faith

New Delhi, May 2, 2025 — In a significant ruling blending constitutional values with religious sentiments, the Delhi High Court has stepped in to safeguard the sanctity of the Devi Padmavati idol, revered by many in the Jain community.

The case has its roots in a decades-old tradition. The idol of Devi Padmavati was ceremoniously installed in 1978 within the sanctum sanctorum of a well-known Jain temple managed by Jain Sabha Dharmarth Trust. During temple renovations in 2017–2019, the idol was respectfully relocated. However, when the renovation was completed, all idols except that of Devi Padmavati were restored to their original places. This caused anguish among devotees, who saw the exclusion as not only disrespectful but a violation of established religious practice.

One devotee, Sh. Ajay Jain, filed a civil suit on behalf of the deity — as Indian law recognizes idols as legal entities — seeking her reinstatement. The trial court dismissed the case with the remark that “God is omnipresent,” suggesting worship could happen anywhere. The High Court found this approach “flippant” and lacking sensitivity to religious nuance.

Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani emphasized that courts must not trivialize matters of deep faith. He ordered that the idol remain in the temple and that her seat in the sanctum be kept vacant as a mark of respect until the matter is fully heard.

The next hearing is set for August 28, 2025. The decision marks a significant moment for faith-based legal rights and highlights the judiciary’s role in protecting religious harmony.

You Might Also Like

Minor Girl Has Domain Over Her Body, Can Choose To Terminate Pregnancy: Madras HC

Supreme Court Upholds Regularisation Of Daily Wage Worker By MP High Court

Earning Men Can’t Claim ‘No Resources’ to Avoid Maintenance: Kerala HC

Supreme Court Overturns Bihar Staff Selection Commission Decision, Grants Relief To Candidate

Supreme Court Questions Excessive Reservation Under ‘Institutional Preference’ Quota In AIIMS PG Admissions

TAGGED:Delhi High CourtDevi padmavatiIdolIdol disputeJain templeseat of Idol
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Financial Emergency in India - Article 360 explained What Is a Financial Emergency and Has India Ever Faced One? (Article 360 Explained)
Next Article How To Apply For A Senior Citizen Medical Insurance Policy? Can a Senior Citizen Cancel a Property Gift if Neglected? (Section 23 Of Senior Citizens Act Explained)
1 Comment
  • Pingback: Foreign Nationality Not a Ground to Deny Bail Under NDPS Act: Delhi HC - ApniLaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Supreme Court of India
CriminalCrPCDocumentationNewsSupreme Court

Supreme Court: Magistrates Cannot Order FIR Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Without Justification

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Supreme Court Ruling: Vendor Cannot Re-Sell Property Pending Registration
Mental Disorders Like Schizophrenia Not Enough for Divorce, Living Conditions Must Be Severe: Patna High Court
Live-In Relationships Must Be Registered Until Law is Enacted: Rajasthan High Court
Supreme Court Halts Contempt Proceedings Against DDA Vice Chairman, Seeks CJI’s Clarification
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

POCSO Act

Granted Interim Bail Under Humanitarian Grounds in POCSO Case: Delhi HC

Supreme Court To Hear Petition Against Demolition Of Mangolpuri Mosque On August 1

Law on Foreign Contributions: NGO Not to Be Suspected Without Proof of Misuse, Rules Madras High Court

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?