By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Ask a Lawyer
  • Find a Lawyer
  • Our Services
  • Legal News
  • Knowledge Hub
    • Bare Acts
      • BNS
      • BNSS
      • BSA
      • CrPC
      • CPC
      • DPDP
      • Hindu Marriage Act
      • Hindu Succession Act
      • The Hindu Adoptions And Maintenance Act
      • The Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act
      • IPC
      • Juvenile Justice Act
      • POCSO
      • Special Marriage Act
      • The Specific Relief Act
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
    • Legal Articles
    • Students Section – Judiciary, UPSC
    • Job Updates
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
  • About Us
Reading: Consent For Physical Relations Doesn’t Include Sharing Private Videos: Delhi HC
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Ask a Lawyer
  • Find a Lawyer
  • Our Services
  • Legal News
  • Knowledge Hub
  • About Us
  • Home
  • Ask a Lawyer
  • Find a Lawyer
  • Our Services
  • Legal News
  • Knowledge Hub
    • Bare Acts
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
    • Legal Articles
    • Students Section – Judiciary, UPSC
    • Job Updates
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
  • About Us
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Delhi High Court > Consent For Physical Relations Doesn’t Include Sharing Private Videos: Delhi HC
Delhi High CourtHigh CourtNewsWomen Rights

Consent For Physical Relations Doesn’t Include Sharing Private Videos: Delhi HC

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: January 27, 2025 11:46 pm
Amna Kabeer
7 months ago
Share
Delhi High Court case
Delhi High Court case
SHARE

Consent For Physical Relations Doesn’t Include Sharing Private Videos

The Delhi High Court ruled that a woman’s consent for physical relations does not extend to capturing or sharing her private moments on social media. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma emphasized that such actions constitute exploitation and misuse of privacy.

Contents
Consent For Physical Relations Doesn’t Include Sharing Private VideosCase OverviewCourt’s ObservationsVerdict


Case Overview


The Court denied bail to a man accused of rape and blackmail by a married woman. According to the FIR, the accused gave the woman money for a course, which she promised to repay after getting a job. He later used this financial transaction to manipulate and blackmail her.
The complainant alleged the accused forced her to undress during WhatsApp video calls and showed her intimate videos to coerce her into physical relations. He later defamed her by sharing these videos with people in her village and posting them on social media.


Court’s Observations


Consent for sexual relations does not imply consent to create or share inappropriate videos.
The accused’s actions of coercion and blackmail go beyond any initial consensual interaction.
Exploiting a loan transaction to manipulate or diminish someone’s dignity is unacceptable.
The accused weaponized the complainant’s marital status and profession to downplay the allegations, which the Court rejected.


Verdict


The Court dismissed the bail plea and directed the Director of FSL to expedite the forensic report to assist the investigation.

You Might Also Like

How To Apply For A Voter ID Card Correction

Meghalaya High Court Upholds 20-Year Sentence In Aggravated Sexual Assault Case

Supreme Court Rebukes UP Principal Secretary Over False Affidavit In Remission Case

Past Irregular Promotions Cannot Justify Future Violations: Supreme Court

Defenses Available In Cheque Bounce Cases: How An Accused Can Fight

TAGGED:Criminal OffenceDelhi High CourtOnlineSexual Offenceswomen rights
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Supreme Court of India Bodily Injuries Are Not Essential to Prove Sexual Assault: Supreme Court
Next Article Supreme Court: NDMC Not Responsible For Staff Absorption After DSGMC School Closure Without Approval Past Irregular Promotions Cannot Justify Future Violations: Supreme Court
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
POSH Act - Women at Workplace
Employment & BusinessIndian ConstitutionNewsSupreme Court

Right to Voluntarily Close Business Under Article 19(1)(g): SC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
2 months ago
Fixed Deposits, Jewels Fall Under ‘Property’ in Senior Citizens Act: Madras High Court
Gujarat High Court Issues Notices To Times Of India and Indian Express Editors Over Misrepresentation Of Court Proceedings
The Evolution And Impact Of Anti-Conversion Laws In India
Golden Hour and Good Samaritan Provisions Under the MV Act (Section 134A)
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.
login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?