By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Cash In Bank Account Is ‘Property’ Liable For Attachment: Kerala High Court
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Kerala High Court > Cash In Bank Account Is ‘Property’ Liable For Attachment: Kerala High Court
High CourtKerala High CourtNews

Cash In Bank Account Is ‘Property’ Liable For Attachment: Kerala High Court

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: February 1, 2025 10:04 pm
Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Share
High Court of Kerala
High Court of Kerala
SHARE

Cash In Bank Account Is ‘Property’ Liable For Attachment

The Kerala High Court ruled that cash in a bank account qualifies as “property” and can be provisionally attached under Section 281B of the Income Tax Act. A Division Bench comprising Justices Sathish Ninan and Shoba Annamma Eapen clarified that the absence of an explicit mention of bank accounts in Section 281B does not exempt them from attachment.

Contents
Cash In Bank Account Is ‘Property’ Liable For AttachmentCourt Observations and RationaleCourt’s Decision


Court Observations and Rationale


Section 281B allows the Assessing Officer to provisionally attach property to prevent possible tax defaults. In this case, the police seized a large amount of unaccounted cash from the assessee’s car. The authorities initiated proceedings under Section 148 after the assessee failed to explain the source of the cash.
The Income Tax Department expected a tax liability, including penalties, exceeding ₹2 crores. Fearing evasion, they attached the assessee’s bank accounts under Section 281B. While a writ petition initially overturned the attachment, the department challenged the decision before the High Court.
The court emphasized that the provisional attachment must match the probable tax demand and penalty and not exceed it.


Court’s Decision


The court ruled in favor of the department, allowing the attachment of bank accounts. However, it stressed that attachment orders must align with the probable demand, ensuring they are not excessive.

You Might Also Like

Supreme Court Upholds NEET-UG Exam Despite Paper Leak Allegations

Re-Testing Of Drugs in NDPS Cases Allowed Only in Rare Situations: Rajasthan HC

Supreme Court Directs NMC to Provide Stipend Details for MBBS Interns Across States

Insurers Cannot Deny Claims for Non-Renewal of State Permit: Supreme Court

SC or ST Act Cannot Be Invoked Against Members of the Same Community: Punjab & Haryana HC

TAGGED:Bank AccountsCustody of PropertyHigh CourtsKerala High CourtMoneyProperty
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Bail Conditions Cannot Mandate Maintenance Payment In Marital Disputes: Supreme Court Detention Order Doesn’t Prevent Bail Consideration: Madras HC
Next Article High Court of Madras Ex-Servicemen Can Claim Concession If Not Recruited At Application Date: Madras High Court
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court
High CourtKerala High CourtNews

Section 479 BNSS Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively to Convicted Prisoners: Kerala High Court

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Supreme Court Swears In Justices Singh And Mahadevan, Enhancing Bench Diversity
Supreme Court Recognizes Right to Freedom from Adverse Effects of Climate Change in Landmark Decision
Supreme Court Rules On Balancing Surety Requirements with Personal Liberty In Multiple Bail Cases
CIC Criticizes Election Commission’s Delayed Response to RTI Query on EVMs
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?