What happens if someone presents evidence that breaks the rules of Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act? Is that evidence legally valid? Could you share any Supreme Court rulings on this?

If evidence is presented that violates Section 115 of the Indian Evidence Act, it is considered inadmissible and will not be accepted by the court. This is because Section 115 prohibits the admission of evidence that has been obtained illegally or through coercion. The Supreme Court has consistently upheld this principle, emphasizing that the integrity of the judicial process depends on the reliability and legitimacy of evidence.