By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Mosque Falls Under ‘Waqf’, Disputes to Be Heard by Waqf Tribunal: Rajasthan HC
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Rajasthan High Court > Mosque Falls Under ‘Waqf’, Disputes to Be Heard by Waqf Tribunal: Rajasthan HC
High CourtMuslim LawNewsRajasthan High Court

Mosque Falls Under ‘Waqf’, Disputes to Be Heard by Waqf Tribunal: Rajasthan HC

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: February 28, 2025 9:44 pm
Amna Kabeer
4 months ago
Share
Rajasthan High Court
Rajasthan High Court
SHARE

Jaipur: The Rajasthan High Court has ruled that a mosque, being a place of religious worship, falls under the definition of ‘Waqf’ as per Section 3(r) of the Waqf Act, 1995. The Waqf Tribunal must exclusively adjudicate disputes regarding such properties.

Contents
Court’s RulingTrial Court’s ErrorKey ObservationsImplications and Recent Legislative Developments


Court’s Ruling


A bench of Justice Birendra Kumar cited Section 85 of the Waqf Act. It bars civil courts, revenue courts, or other authorities from hearing cases related to waqf properties. The Court clarified that the jurisdiction for such disputes lies solely with the Waqf Tribunal.
The ruling came in response to a civil revision petition challenging a lower court’s refusal. This was to reject a plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The case involved the Madina Zama Masjid, allegedly built with contributions from the local Muslim community. The petitioners (original defendants) claimed ownership of the mosque property. But, the plaintiffs sought an injunction to prevent any interference with religious activities.


Trial Court’s Error


The civil court dismissed the petitioners’ plea because officials had not registered the mosque as waqf property. The High Court, however, held that permanent dedication of immovable property for religious use qualifies it as waqf. This is regardless of its registration status. As a result, the civil court lacked jurisdiction.


Key Observations


The Court ruled that:
The Waqf Act covers a mosque as a place of religious worship. The Waqf Tribunal must address disputes related to waqf properties.
The civil court erred in hearing the case, violating the bar under Section 85 of the Waqf Act.
The High Court allowed the civil revision petition, directing the rejection of the plaint and granting liberty to the plaintiffs to approach the Waqf Tribunal within four weeks.


Implications and Recent Legislative Developments


Under Islamic law, donors irrevocably dedicate waqf properties for religious or charitable purposes. A ‘mutawalli’ is appointed to manage such properties.
In August 2024, the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, 2024, and the Mussalman Wakf (Repeal) Bill, 2024, were introduced in the Lok Sabha to streamline waqf management. This change could impact historically recognized waqf properties like mosques and graveyards that lack formal documentation.
The High Court’s decision reinforces the jurisdictional framework under the Waqf Act while aligning with ongoing legal reforms in waqf administration.

You Might Also Like

College Canteen Run By Educational Trust Must Register Under KVAT Act: Kerala HC

How DGCA Got More Powers Under the New Bharatiya Vayuyan Adhiniyam

Section 142 – Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita(BNSS) – Power To Release Persons Imprisoned For Failing To Give Security.

Bombay HC Grants Bail to Rape Accused; Questions Feasibility of Crime at Crowded Beach on Eid

Supreme Court Directs Bar Association Election Disputes To Civil Courts, Keeps Legal Question Open

TAGGED:High CourtmosqueMuslim Prayerswaqf
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Supreme Court of India No Personal Presence Required in Domestic Violence Proceedings: SC
Next Article Allahabad High Court Clears Path For Suits In Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Eidgah Mosque Dispute Civil Court Decree Necessary for Name Change in Board Certificates: Allahabad High Court
7 Comments
  • Pingback: What Is The Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025? - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: Empowering Self-Representation: Laws, Principles And Inspiring Precedents - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: The Enduring Influence Of Judicial Precedents On Indian Jurisprudence - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: The Binding Nature And Challenges Of Judicial Precedents In India - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: An Overview On Special Leave Petition - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: Allahabad High Court Clears Path For Suits In Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Eidgah Mosque Dispute - ApniLaw
  • Pingback: No Fundamental Right to Live-In Relationship With a Married Woman: Rajasthan High Court - ApniLaw

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Money Laundering Case
News

Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail To OAS Officer Bijay Ketan Sahoo In Money Laundering Case

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
10 months ago
Supreme Court Seeks Committee To Negotiate With Protesting Farmers At Punjab-Haryana Border
Dowry Demand Not Necessary To Prove Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC: Supreme Court
Child Deemed Legitimate If Married Couple Had Access During Conception, Rules Supreme Court
Supreme Court Warns Baba Ramdev and Patanjali MD for Contempt, Stresses Respect for Allopathy
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Prisoner Freed Despite Missing File By Calcutta High Court

Punishment and Legal Action Under Section 6 of Indecent Representation of Women Act

Media & Entertainment Law: Career Insights And Opportunities

What Content Is Banned and What’s Allowed Under the Indecent Representation of Women Act? (Sections 3, 4 and 5)

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?