By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
ApniLawApniLawApniLaw
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Reading: Neglect Or Abandonment Of Elderly Parents Violate Right To Dignity Under Article 21: Allahabad HC
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
ApniLawApniLaw
Font ResizerAa
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court
  • Acts
  • Documentation
  • BNSS
  • Home
  • Law Forum
  • Find Lawyers
  • Legal Services
  • Legal News
  • Legal Jobs
  • Legal Articles
    • Documentation
    • Marriage and Divorce
    • Land Dispute & Will
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Supreme Court
    • High Court
  • Bare Acts
    • BNSS
    • BNS
    • BSA
    • CrPC
    • DPDP
    • Hindu Marriage Act
    • IPC
    • POCSO
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
ApniLaw > Blog > High Court > Allahabad High Court > Neglect Or Abandonment Of Elderly Parents Violate Right To Dignity Under Article 21: Allahabad HC
Allahabad High CourtSenior Citizens

Neglect Or Abandonment Of Elderly Parents Violate Right To Dignity Under Article 21: Allahabad HC

Amna Kabeer
Last updated: July 26, 2025 12:47 pm
Amna Kabeer
1 day ago
Share
Allahabad High Court
Allahabad High Court
SHARE

The Allahabad High Court strongly condemned the mistreatment of elderly parents, stating that cruelty, neglect, or abandonment violates their fundamental right to life with dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution. A bench of Justices Mahesh Chandra Tripathi and Prashant Kumar emphasized that caring for ageing parents is both a moral and legal duty. The case involved a 75-year-old man seeking over ₹21 lakh as compensation for his acquired land and superstructure. Though the compensation was assessed and a payment notice issued, his sons blocked the release, claiming co-ownership. The petitioner alleged that his sons abused him physically and mentally after the compensation was announced. Despite this, he expressed willingness to share part of the amount. The Court, shocked by the sons’ behaviour, called it a societal and moral failure.

It ruled that a hostile home violates Article 21 and asserted the judiciary must act when familial care collapses. The bench ordered immediate release of the compensation to the father. They also warned that any future interference by the sons would invite strict action. The Court disposed of the petition, standing firmly for elder dignity and justice.

You Might Also Like

Only Transferor Senior Citizens Can Seek Cancellation of Property Settlement Under Section 23(1) of the Senior Citizens Act: Madras HC

Absence Due To Imprisonment Does Not Create Right To Wages: Allahabad High Court

Accused Must Have Lived in Shared Household for Domestic Violence Case:Allahabad High Court

Virginity Test Violates Women’s Dignity Under Article 21: Chattisgarh HC

Tribunals for Senior Citizens: How They Help Protect Rights (Sections 7–10)

TAGGED:Allahabad High CourtArticle 21Custody of PropertyRight to DignitySenior citizenSenior citizen right
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
Previous Article Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 What Is Presumption of Debt in Cheque Cases: Section 139 of Negotiable Instrument Act
Next Article Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 Compounding Of Cheque Bounce Offence: Section 147 of the Negotiable Instrument Act
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
InstagramFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
Child Adoption
Chhattisgarh High CourtEmployment & BusinessNewsWomen Rights

Adoptive Mothers Also Entitled to Maternity Leave: Chattisgarh HC

Amna Kabeer
By Amna Kabeer
3 months ago
Passports For Minor Children Can Be Renewed Without Father’s Consent: Madhya Pradesh HC
Supreme Court: Magistrates Cannot Order FIR Under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Without Justification
Calcutta High Court Stresses Need For Forensic Science Capacity Building For Effective BNSS Implementation
What Is The General Diary Of The Police And How Is It Related To An FIR?
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Your one-stop destination for legal news, articles, queries, and a directory of lawyers in India – all under one roof at ApniLaw.

Stay Updated

  • BNSS
  • News
  • Documentation
  • Acts
  • Supreme Court
  • High Court

Information

  • ApniLaw Services
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Advertise

  • Advertise with us
  • Newsletters
  • Deal

Find Us on Socials

ApniLawApniLaw
Follow US
© ApniLaw 2025. All Rights Reserved.
bg-n
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.

More Interesting News

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Defenses Available In Cheque Bounce Cases: How An Accused Can Fight

Cheque Bounce - Negotiable Instruments Act 1881

Difference Between Civil Recovery and Criminal Action in Cheque Bounce Cases Under Negotiable Instruments Act

login
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?